带有密码保护的心灵读取脑植入物
A mind–reading brain implant that comes with password protection

原始链接: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02589-5

## 脑植入物解码内心语言,具备隐私功能 研究人员开发出一种脑机接口(BCI),能够以高达74%的准确率解码想象中的语言——“内心声音”。这项研究发表在*Cell*杂志上,标志着为瘫痪或言语障碍患者恢复沟通迈出了重要一步。 与以往需要尝试发声的BCI不同,该设备直接从运动皮层在*内心*语言期间翻译大脑信号。一项关键创新是“密码”机制:系统只有在用户有意识地想到预定义的关键词时才会激活,从而保护隐私并防止意外解码。 研究团队训练人工智能模型,从四名有言语困难的参与者的大脑活动中识别语音单位(音素)。然后,这些音素从包含125,000个单词的词汇中组装成句子。虽然内心语言信号比尝试发声的信号弱,但所达到的准确率与早期的BCI系统相当,为未来的沟通工具提供了一条有希望的途径。

## 脑读植入物与密码保护 - Hacker News 摘要 一篇最近发表在 *Nature.com* 上的文章详细介绍了一种脑机接口 (BCI),能够将思想解码为文本,并受到用户定义的密码保护。该植入物需要侵入性手术和训练期,但允许用户控制何时翻译他们的思想——本质上是在他们的大脑中“打开或关闭麦克风”。 Hacker News 上的讨论既有兴奋,也有担忧。虽然一些人认为密码保护是一种合理的保障措施,但许多人担心政府或恶意行为者可能滥用它,甚至提出涉及强制植入的情景。另一些人指出目前的局限性——需要手术、训练以及相对较低(74%)的准确性——使得秘密使用在*目前*不太可能。 一些评论者提出了对策,例如用构造语言思考或加密大脑活动。一个反复出现的主题是,这项技术有可能变得足够吸引人,从而实现自愿采用,从而为数据收集和利用打开大门,反映了当前生物识别数据和流行应用程序/游戏中的趋势。这场对话凸显了日益复杂的心灵读取技术的伦理影响。
相关文章

原文
A scan of a healthy human brain shown in rainbow colours on a dark blue background

A brain scan (artificially coloured) produced by magnetic resonance imaging. Credit: K H Fung/Science Photo Library

A brain implant can decode a person’s internal chatter — but the device works only if the user thinks of a preset password1.

The mind-reading device, or brain–computer interface (BCI), accurately deciphered up to 74% of imagined sentences. The system began decoding users’ internal speech — the silent dialogue in people’s minds — only when they thought of a specific keyword. This ensured that the system did not accidentally translate sentences that users would rather keep to themselves.

The study, published in Cell on 14 August, represents a “technically impressive and meaningful step” towards developing BCI devices that accurately decode internal speech, says Sarah Wandelt, a neural engineer at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research in Manhasset, New York, who was not involved in the work. The password mechanism also offers a straightforward way to protect users’ privacy, a crucial feature for real-world use, adds Wandelt.

BCI systems translate brain signals into text or audio and have become promising tools for restoring speech in people with paralysis or limited muscle control. Most devices require users to try to speak out loud, which can be exhausting and uncomfortable. Last year, Wandelt and her colleagues developed the first BCI for decoding internal speech, which relied on signals in the supramarginal gyrus, a brain region that plays a major part in speech and language2.

A participant in a red T-shirt looks at a screen that is displaying the words 'If there is a decision to make, they speak first.'

A study participant who has trouble speaking clearly because of a stroke uses the brain–computer interface.Credit: Emory BrainGate Team

But there’s a risk that these internal-speech BCIs could accidentally decode sentences users never intended to utter, says Erin Kunz, a neural engineer at Stanford University in California. “We wanted to investigate this robustly,” says Kunz, who co-authored the new study.

First, Kunz and her colleagues analysed brain signals collected by microelectrodes placed in the motor cortex — the region involved in voluntary movements — of four participants. All four have trouble speaking, one because of a stroke and three because of motor neuron disease, a degeneration of the nerves that leads to loss of muscle control. The researchers instructed participants to either attempt to say a set of words or imagine saying them.

Recordings of the participants’ brain activity showed that attempted and internal speech originated in the same brain region and generated similar neural signals, but those associated with internal speech were weaker.

Next, Kunz and her colleagues used this data to train artificial-intelligence models to recognize phonemes, the smallest units of speech, in the neural recordings. The team used language models to stitch these phonemes together to form words and sentences in real time, drawn from a vocabulary of 125,000 words.

The device correctly interpreted 74% of sentences imagined by two participants who were instructed to think of specific phrases. This level of accuracy is similar to that of the team’s earlier BCI for attempted speech, says Kunz.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com