以色列一个部队被指控抹黑加沙记者,将他们描述为哈马斯战士——报道。
Israeli unit tasked with smearing Gaza journalists as Hamas fighters – report

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/15/israeli-military-unit-reportedly-tasked-with-linking-journalists-in-gaza-to-hamas

一份最近曝光的以色列军事单位,被称为“合法化小组”,据称在10月7日袭击事件后,致力于抹黑巴勒斯坦记者,将他们描绘成哈马斯成员。根据向+972杂志透露的情报来源,该单位的主要目标是公共关系——提升以色列的国际形象和维持军事支持,而非真正的安全问题。 该小组积极试图将记者与哈马斯联系起来,甚至歪曲信息,错误地将一名记者标记为武装分子,尽管该认定后来被撤销。这一策略与对巴勒斯坦记者死亡事件日益增加的关注同时发生,包括半岛电视台的阿纳斯·阿尔-沙里夫,以色列声称他是一名哈马斯指挥官。 消息人士表示,该单位旨在“制造杀害批评记者的共识”,认为他们的报道损害了以色列的声誉。该单位内部对优先考虑公关而非安全,以及可能滥用机密信息表示担忧。这一努力凸显了巴勒斯坦记者在加沙面临的极端危险,在不到两年的时间里,已有超过180人丧生。

## 黑客新闻讨论摘要:以色列与加沙的记者报道 一份最近的《卫报》报告,源自以色列-巴勒斯坦媒体+972杂志,声称一个以色列单位正在积极努力抹黑加沙记者,通过将他们与哈马斯虚假联系来达到目的。黑客新闻的讨论显示,围绕冲突报道存在深刻的怀疑和两极分化。 许多评论员对来自双方媒体都表示不信任,认为其叙述存在偏见和“含糊其辞”。一些人认为+972杂志是一个信誉良好的消息来源,拥有内部军事联系,强调了他们之前的曝光,例如“薰衣草”人工智能目标系统。另一些人则质疑该媒体的客观性,理由是其地理位置和政治倾向。 一个反复出现的主题是,黑客新闻本身对异议观点的压制,用户报告称批评以色列的帖子经常被举报。一些评论员认为以色列利用10月7日的袭击作为对加沙采取行动的*casus belli*(战争理由),而另一些人则强调通过他们自己的媒体来源了解以色列视角的的重要性。 讨论还涉及对记者的袭击和杀害,声称以色列杀害的巴勒斯坦记者数量明显高于哈马斯杀害的记者数量。
相关文章

原文

A special unit in Israel’s military was tasked with identifying reporters it could smear as undercover Hamas fighters, to target them and to blunt international outrage over the killing of media workers, the Israeli-Palestinian outlet +972 Magazine reports.

The “legitimisation cell” was set up after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack to gather information that could bolster Israel’s image and shore up diplomatic and military support from key allies, the report said, citing three intelligence sources.

According to the report, in at least one case the unit misrepresented information in order to falsely describe a journalist as a militant, a designation that in Gaza is in effect a death sentence. The label was reversed before the man was attacked, one of the sources said.

Earlier this week, Israel killed the Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and three colleagues in their makeshift newsroom, after claiming Sharif was a Hamas commander. The killings focused global attention on the extreme dangers faced by Palestinian journalists in Gaza and Israel’s efforts to manipulate media coverage of the war.

Foreign reporters have been barred from entering Gaza apart from a few brief and tightly controlled trips with the Israeli military, who impose restrictions including a ban on speaking to Palestinians.

Palestinian journalists reporting from the ground are the most at risk in the world, with more than 180 killed by Israeli attacks in less than two years, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Israel carried out 26 targeted killings of journalists in that period, the CPJ said, describing them as murders.

Israel has produced an unconvincing dossier of unverified evidence on Sharif’s purported Hamas links, and failed to address how he would have juggled a military command role with regular broadcast duties in one of the most heavily surveilled places on Earth. Israel did not attempt to justify killing his three colleagues.

Before the attack, press freedom groups and Sharif himself had warned that Israeli accusations of Hamas links, first made in 2024, were designed to “manufacture consent to kill”. They had been revived and repeated with increasing frequency after his reporting on famine in Gaza went viral.

Intelligence sources told +972 magazine that the “legitimisation cell” worked to undermine the work done by Palestinian journalists as well as their protected status under international law.

Officers were eager to find a media worker they could link to Hamas, because they were convinced Gaza-based journalists were “smearing [Israel’s] name in front of the world”, a source was quoted saying.

In at least one case, they misrepresented evidence to falsely claim a reporter was an undercover militant, two sources said, although the designation was reversed before an attack was ordered.

“They were eager to label him as a target, as a terrorist, to say it’s OK to attack him,” one recalled. “They said: during the day he’s a journalist, at night he’s a platoon commander. Everyone was excited. But there was a chain of errors and corner-cutting.”

“In the end, they realised he really was a journalist,” the source added, and the reporter was taken off the target list.

Israel’s government often gave the army orders about where the unit should focus their work, and the primary motive of the “legitimisation cell” was public relations, not national security, the sources said.

When media criticism of Israel over a particular issue intensified the cell would be tasked with finding intelligence that could be declassified and used to counter the narrative, the magazine reported.

“If the global media is talking about Israel killing innocent journalists, then immediately there’s a push to find one journalist who might not be so innocent, as if that somehow makes killing the other 20 acceptable,” the article quoted an intelligence source saying.

The cell also reportedly sought information on Hamas’s use of schools and hospitals for military purposes, and failed attacks by Palestinian armed groups that harmed civilians there.

Some in the unit were reportedly concerned about publishing classified material for public relations reasons rather than military or security objectives. Officers were told their work was crucial to Israel’s ability to keep fighting, one source said.

“The idea was to (allow the military to) operate without pressure, so countries like America wouldn’t stop supplying weapons,” a second source said. “Anything that could bolster Israel’s international legitimacy to keep fighting.”

The IDF has been approached for comment.

On Friday, at least 16 Palestinians were killed by Israeli attacks in Gaza, including five who were trying to get food aid, medical sources told Al Jazeera.

Israel also issued evacuation orders for northern parts of Gaza City’s Zeitoun neighbourhood, as it intensified military operations before a planned escalation of the ground war in Gaza, which has been widely criticised domestically and abroad.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com