书很快将在学校里被淘汰。
Books will soon be obsolete in school

原始链接: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/08/books-will-soon-be-obsolete-in-school/

这篇短文强调了教育领域技术炒作的反复出现。作者回顾了一个历史轶事:1913年,弗雷德里克·史密斯问托马斯·爱迪生,电影是否会在十年内取代学校的书籍,爱迪生对此自信地做出了肯定预测。一个多世纪过去了,书籍仍然是学习的核心。 作者将此与当前对人工智能在教育领域的热情相提并论,注意到类似的传统方法即将过时的说法,以及系统将迅速而彻底变革的说法。虽然承认人工智能作为工具的潜力,作者对它成为教育的唯一方法表示怀疑,并指出存在推动这一叙事的既得利益。 核心信息是警示性的:历史表明,新技术很少完全取代既定方法,而盲目接受大胆的预测是不明智的。就像视频没有取代书籍一样,人工智能可能也不会。

## 黑客新闻讨论:学校里的书籍与教育的未来 一篇最近的文章暗示书籍将在学校中变得过时,这在黑客新闻上引发了热烈的讨论。许多评论员质疑对技术进步的过度推断,指出人类倾向于预测剧烈的变化,而生活的核心方面——出生、工作、学习——却保持着惊人的稳定。尽管有新技术,书籍因其价格低廉、可访问性和信息密度而被认为具有持久性。 然而,对话很快转向了现代教育面临的重大挑战。几位教师和教师配偶分享了关于沉重的精神负担、学生暴力和资源不足的轶事。许多人认为人工智能的潜力在于缓解这些问题,不一定取代传统的学习方法。 解决方案从增加学校辅导员和警察的资金,到更严格的纪律措施,甚至在青少年拘留所中使用人工智能。一个反复出现的主题是需要解决破坏性行为的根本原因,承认孩子的问题往往源于他们的家庭生活。一些人认为应该放弃“零容忍”政策,回归个性化辅导,而另一些人则捍卫公共教育的价值,尽管它存在缺陷。最终,这场讨论凸显了技术、社会问题和教育根本目标之间复杂的相互作用。
相关文章

原文

I recently had a chance to ask a question to one of the top AI people. At a Q&A session, I raised my hand and asked simply "What is your estimation of the future educational value of AI?"

The response was swift and utterly devastating for those laggards who want to hold back progress. The AI guy said:

Books will soon be obsolete in schools. Scholars will be instructed through AI. It is possible to teach every branch of human knowledge with AI. Our school system will be completely changed inside of ten years.

We have been working for some time on educational AI. It proves conclusively the worth of AI in chemistry, physics and other branches of study, making the scientific truths, difficult to understand from text books, plain and clear to children.

That's it. We can throw away all those outdated paper books. Children will learn directly from an AI which, coincidentally, is sold by the company. We can trust their studies on such matters and be assured that they have no ulterior motive.

But, ah my friends, I have told a slight untruth. I didn't ask that question. Frederick James Smith asked the question to Thomas Edison in 1913. The question was about the new and exciting world of motion pictures.

Scan of old newsprint. "What is your estimation of the future educational
value of pictures?" I asked.
" Books." declared the inventor with decision, " will soon be obsolete in the public schools. Scholars will be instructed through the eye. It is possible to teach every branch of human knowledge with the motion picture. Our school system will be completely changed inside of ten years. " We have been working for some time on the school pictures. We have been studying and reproducing the life of the fly. mosquito, silk weaving moth, brown moth, gypsy moth, butterflies, scale and various other insects, as well as chemical cbrystallization. It proves conclusively the worth of motion pictures in chemistry, physics and other branches of study, making the scientific truths, difficult to understand from text books, plain and clear to children

You can read the full exchange from The New York Dramatic Mirror.

A hundred-plus years since the great and humble Edison made his prediction and… books are still used in schools! Those of us of a certain age remember a TV occasionally being wheeled in for one lesson or another. Today's kids watch more video content than ever - of mixed quality - but still rely on books and teachers.

Videos are good for some aspects of learning, but woefully inadequate for others.

I'm not trying to say that just because one technology failed, so will all others. But it is amazing how AI-proponents are recycling the same arguments with basically the same timescale. Will AI be part of education? Sure! Just like videos, pocket computers, the Metaverse, and performance enhancing drugs.

Will it be the only tool ever needed for education? I doubt it. Will vested interests and uncritical journalists continue to boost it? You don't need to have read many history books to work out the answer.

Further reading: In the Future All Food Will Be Cooked in a Microwave, and if You Can’t Deal With That Then You Need to Get Out of the Kitchen

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com