亿万富翁为社会主义:佐赫兰·曼达尼背后的20亿美元“草根”行动
Billionaires For Socialism: The $2 Billion "Grassroots" Operation Behind Zohran Mamdani

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/billionaires-socialism-2-billion-grassroots-operation-behind-zohran-mamdani

纽约州工薪家庭党(WFP)将自己描绘成支持工薪家庭的基层组织,但调查显示其主要资金来自亿万富翁乔治·索罗斯,并运作为一个复杂的“洗钱”行动。索罗斯的资金通过开放社会研究所和潮汐基金会等免税组织流动——后者声称运营规模巨大,但没有列出任何员工——然后被输送到WFP支持的政治候选人手中。 这种体系允许富裕捐助者施加政治影响,同时掩盖资金来源,可能违反禁止慈善机构进行政治活动的美国国税局(IRS)规定。审计发现这些组织存在“重大缺陷”和共同领导,凸显了缺乏隔离。 WFP经常批评亿万富翁,同时接受来自他们的巨额资金,其议程,包括激进政策,与许多工薪家庭的利益相悖。人们担心监督受到损害,WFP资深人士在竞选财务委员会中任职。作者认为,这个网络构成了一项重大的税务欺诈,每年可能给美国纳税人造成4.5亿美元的损失,并且由于其进步的品牌形象而受到优待。

相关文章

原文

Submitted by Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising

How the Working Families Party sells itself as "grassroots" — with IRS-documented, publicly admitted "common control" revealing it's really a Soros-financed political money washer.

In New York politics, there's one machine that towers above the rest. No, not the Democratic Party—it's the Working Families Party, the most powerful minor party in America. Its name sounds wholesome enough—who doesn't support "working families"? But behind that branding lies a $2 billion tax-exempt laundromat that's anything but local, grassroots, or honest.

Take Zohran Mamdani, their current belle of the ball. 

After winning his race, he announced on NBC: "I don't think we should have billionaires." Hilarious considering Mamdani's "grassroots" revolution was fueled by over $2 million in PAC and organizational spending, much of it courtesy of the very billionaire class he allegedly opposes.

This is the theater of modern politics: denounce wealth while being powered by it. And the actors know their audience. They've learned that if you slap "grassroots" on the packaging, voters won't check the label.

But let's check it anyway.

The money trail revealed in Sam Antar's breaking report is straightforward enough. Soros donates to the Open Society Institute, a $4.5 billion "charity" that enjoys generous tax deductions. OSI then transfers millions to other "charities" like Tides Foundation, which mysteriously claims to run a $350 million operation with zero employees. From there, the money "converts" into political cash: Tides passes funds to the Working Families Organization, a 501(c)(4), which then wires millions to PACs that bankroll candidates like Mamdani.

What you have is billionaire money dressed up in "working families" clothing, masquerading as the will of the people while being anything but. 

And don't take my word for it. These groups openly admit to "common control" and "shared staff" across their charities and political arms. In plain English: the same people make decisions for both sides of the ledger. One day they're signing checks for the "charity," the next for the political arm. The IRS explicitly forbids this. Charities must operate "exclusively" for charitable purposes. The moment they cross into political campaigning, their exemptions should be revoked.

Auditors have already blown the whistle. Deloitte and Withum both flagged "significant deficiencies" and "common officers" across these supposedly separate entities. The IRS has a simple doctrine for this: substance over form. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and flaps like a duck, it doesn't matter if the paperwork calls it a horse.

The numbers are staggering. Soros's network alone controls $5.57 billion in assets, generating untaxed returns. If properly taxed, that would mean roughly $450 million a year back to American taxpayers. Instead, the money is siphoned into a political machine that signals to the public that it represents them while pushing the Open Societies agenda. 

Meanwhile, the watchdogs were compromised. Larry Moskowitz, a 15-year WFP veteran, sat on the New York City Campaign Finance Board (CFB) while these schemes played out. A senior staffer at the same agency, David Duhalde, the former deputy director of the DSA, also worked at the CFB while his organization ran someone for mayor. 

In other words, the referees were not only wearing the team jersey—they were helping write the playbook.

And so you see things that are mathematically impossible: same-day circular transactions, PACs that pay for services with money they never had, taxpayer matching funds generated by coordinated activities that should have been disqualified. In any other setting, this would be called fraud. In politics, but when progressives control the government agencies, it's called "movement-building."

It's all part of a larger hypocrisy. The WFP rails against billionaires while being funded by them. It preaches "democracy" while short-circuiting the rules designed to protect it. And it claims to stand for working families while serving as the cash pipeline for radicals whose agenda—abolishing capitalism, police, borders, and private property—would make working families' lives unrecognizable.

This is the great genius of the modern left: to run what is essentially a billionaire-backed, tax-exempt machine while insisting it's "grassroots." It's not just dishonest—it's corrosive. Because when billionaires can buy socialism tax-free, when oversight boards are stacked with partisans, and when voters are told they're seeing a bottom-up revolution while it's actually a top-down operation, democracy becomes little more than political theater.

The IRS has more than enough evidence. Over a thousand pages of filings, audits, and disclosures show the same thing: systematic tax fraud, documented in their own paperwork. The question is whether anyone in Washington has the courage to act.

If this were a conservative network, there would be hearings, front-page outrage, and high-profile perp walks. Instead, because the machine flies a progressive banner, it gets a pass. Billionaires for socialism—what a joke. But the laugh's on us, and the bill is north of $450 million a year.

Working Families? Please. This is a billionaire racket. And unless the IRS acts, it will keep laundering tax-exempt dollars into political power, one "grassroots" revolution at a time.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com