保守派人士对英国上诉法院裁决支持政府继续开放移民酒店表示愤怒。
Conservatives Rage After UK Court Of Appeal Rules With Govt To Keep Migrant Hotel Open

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/conservatives-rage-after-uk-court-appeal-rules-govt-keep-migrant-hotel-open

英国政府成功推翻了埃塞克斯郡地方议会对一间被用作安置寻求庇护者酒店的关闭尝试。埃平森林区议会辩称贝尔酒店的使用违反了规划法,并获得了一份临时禁令。然而,上诉法院裁定内政部胜诉,理由是寻求庇护者的权利高于议会的担忧,并且下级法院在发布禁令时犯了错误。 这一决定取消了寻求庇护者的搬迁期限,并将最终裁决推迟到十月的听证会。此案引发了政治争议,反对派议员指责工党政府将移民置于当地安全之上。保守党人表达了强烈批评,要求更严格的移民政策,甚至呼吁废除内政部。尽管承认这次挫折,保守党领导人承诺将继续支持挑战类似安排的议会。有关司法偏见的指控也浮出水面,进一步加剧了辩论。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

The British government has won its legal fight against a local council that sought to shut down a migrant hotel in Essex.

The Court of Appeal ruled on Friday that a temporary injunction obtained by Epping Forest District Council against the continued use of the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers should be overturned.

During the hearing, Home Office lawyers argued that the human rights of asylum seekers outweighed the council’s decision to close the hotel. The council had insisted that Somani Hotels, which owns the Bell Hotel, was in breach of planning law by changing its use to accommodate migrants. But the judges found that the lower court, which granted the injunction, had made errors that “undermine his decision.”

The ruling lifts the interim injunction and scraps a Sept. 12 deadline for asylum seekers to be relocated. A final appeal hearing will take place later this year.

The hotel has been at the center of controversy in recent months after anti-immigration protests erupted in the town, following the arrest of one of its occupants on suspicion of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old schoolgirl.

The Court of Appeal’s decision has sparked anger among opposition lawmakers, who accused Labour of prioritizing the rights of illegal immigrants over the safety of local communities.

Robert Jenrick, the Conservatives’ shadow justice secretary, posted: “Starmer’s government has shown itself to be on the side of illegal migrants who have broken into our country.”

Rupert Lowe, an MP and leader of Restore Britain, wrote: “A Government against its own people. No more appeals, court cases, or debates. We must deport the illegal migrants. Not some of them. Not most of them. All of them.” He later called for the Home Office to be abolished.

Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, said the ruling was a setback but vowed to keep fighting: “Local communities should not pay the price for Labour’s total failure on illegal immigration. This ruling is a setback, but it is not the end. I say to Conservative councils seeking similar injunctions against asylum hotels – keep going! Every case has different circumstances, and I know good Conservative councils will keep fighting for residents, so we will keep working with them every step of the way.”

Ben Habib, leader of Advance UK, echoed the anger: “He says he wants to shut illegal migrant hotels, but Keir Starmer fights tooth and nail to keep them open. Against the wishes of local residents and the local authority, the Epping hotel will now stay open. So much for democracy and the security of British citizens.”

Kelvin MacKenzie, former editor of The Sun, went further, alleging judicial bias: “No surprise Lord Justice Bean, a Labour Party member for 28 years, has in his Appeal Court judgment, stopped the 128 migrants being kicked out of the Bell Hotel in Epping. The law and Labour are in lockstep. A migrant has more rights than a British citizen. A serious moment.”

A full trial to determine the future of the hotel will take place in October.

Read more here...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com