田纳西男子因发布脸书表情包被捕,保释金200万美元。
Tennessee Man Arrested, Gets $2M Bond for Posting Facebook Meme

原始链接: https://reason.com/2025/10/10/tennessee-man-arrested-gets-2-million-bond-for-posting-facebook-meme/

查理·柯克遇刺后,一名田纳西男子拉里·布沙特因发布被认定为威胁的脸书表情包而被捕,并被200万美元保释金羁押。该表情包引用了唐纳德·特朗普的名言(在校枪击事件后说:“我们必须克服它”),并添加了与该事件相关的文字。 地方当局将该帖子——特别是其中提及“佩里高中”——解读为对附近同名学校的威胁,尽管该表情包的明确政治背景是批评人们对柯克死亡的反应。警长尼克·维姆斯表示,布沙特故意试图制造恐慌。 法律专家认为,该帖子受第一修正案保护,属于“政治夸张”而非“真正威胁”。该表情包本身被广泛传播,并非由布沙特发起。他的逮捕引发了批评,人们担心权力过大和压制政治表达,即使这种表达被认为粗俗或不敏感。布沙特面临潜在的监禁和为获得释放而承担的巨大经济负担,听证会现在推迟到12月。

一名田纳西男子因发布一张脸书表情包而被捕,并被设定了200万美元的保释金。当局认为该帖子,一张引用唐纳德·特朗普先前言论的漫画,构成威胁。尽管对其是否构成真正威胁存在争议,但该帖子引发了愤怒,并导致了逮捕。 评论员们广泛讨论了执法部门的过度行为以及司法系统的缓慢进展,指出即使案件最终证据不足,也可能面临长时间的审前拘留。人们对冗长且可能不公正的起诉缺乏后果以及对言论自由的影响表示担忧。一些人指出,针对保守派言论的反应不成比例,而另一些人则强调了司法系统内部更广泛的问题,包括认罪协议以及获得对错误起诉的赔偿的困难。这起事件引发了关于言论自由、感知到的威胁和正当程序之间平衡的辩论。
相关文章

原文

After the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September, many on the political right set out to punish anyone making light of the tragedy, or even simply being insufficiently upset. In one of the more brazen examples, a Tennessee man was arrested, accused of threatening a school shooting, and held on a $2 million bond, for posting a somewhat uncivil meme on Facebook.

Larry Bushart, a 61-year-old former police officer, posted the offending meme last month. In response to a Facebook post about an upcoming vigil for Kirk, Bushart shared an image of President Donald Trump with the quote, "We have to get over it," which Trump said in January 2024 after a shooting at Iowa's Perry High School. Text added to the image said, "This seems relevant today."

Bushart did not elaborate, but the context seems clear: Why should I care about this shooting, when the sitting president said I should "get over" this other shooting?

The image was one of several Bushart posted, and it was far from the most offensive. Still, it certainly feels crass; as people mourned a brutal public murder, Bushart snidely used the occasion to make a partisan political point. But it's certainly well within the bounds of average social media discourse, and you certainly wouldn't expect it to bring the attention of the local police.

"Received a visit from Lexington PD regarding my posted memes," Bushart wrote in a September 21 Facebook status. According to Sheriff Nick Weems of nearby Perry County, "numerous…teachers, parents and students" somehow interpreted Bushart's meme—with its citation in fine print about a previous school shooting at Perry High School in Perry, Iowa—as a threat to carry out a similar shooting at nearby Perry County High School.

According to the Perry County Sheriff's Office website, Bushart was arrested the following morning on a charge of Threats of Mass Violence on School Property and Activities—a class E felony punishable by between one and six years in prison and up to a $3,000 fine. Worse, Bushart's bail is set at an astonishing $2 million.

Mug shot and inmate listing for Larry G. Bushart, Jr, 61-year-old white male arrested 9/22/2025 by Perry County Sheriff's Office on charge of Threats of Mass Violence on School Property and Activites, $2 million bond.
Perry County Sheriff's Office

Under a Tennessee law that went into effect July 1, anyone posting bond must put up at least 10 percent of the total amount, and bail bondsmen must charge a "premium fee" of at least five percent of the total bond amount. Even just to get out of jail ahead of trial, state law says Bushart would have to pay a bondsman at least $210,000.

The Perry County Circuit Court website indicates Bushart had a motion hearing scheduled for October 9, but when reached by phone Friday, a court clerk told Reason the hearing was "reset" for December 4.

Bushart posted the Trump meme "to indicate or make the audience think it was referencing our Perry High School," Weems told The Tennesseean in a statement. "Investigators believe Bushart was fully aware of the fear his post would cause and intentionally sought to create hysteria within the community." Weems also told local radio station WOPC the meme "eluded [sic] to a hypothetical shooting at a place called Perry High School."

This justification is downright laughable. In its entirety, the post consists of a direct quote of a statement by the then-former president about a newsworthy event, with text providing context, plus a four-word phrase added. Bushart didn't even create the meme: The Tennesseean's Angele Latham noted it had been "posted numerous times across multiple social media platforms not connected to Bushart going back to 2024."

"Quote the President of the United States, go to jail," Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, posted on X.

In context, it's clear Bushart meant to suggest that since Trump previously said people should "get over" a school shooting, then they shouldn't be expected to care about the murder of a conservative public figure. It's quite a stretch to suggest this constituted a threat to shoot up a high school. Yes, a nearby high school happened to have a similar name, but that was clearly a coincidence, and there is nothing to suggest Bushart intended to carry out violence against the local school.

On social media, some have suggested the meme in question was part of a larger pattern indicating Bushart posed a threat. But in his statement to The Tennesseean, Weems specifically singled out the Trump meme as the offender, saying while the other posts were "hate memes," they were "not against the law and would be recognized as free speech."

Perhaps some teachers, parents, or students really did find Bushart's post threatening—though since it was a reply on a Facebook page for local news, it's not clear how many people even saw it. And even if people did see and interpret it as a threat of violence, that doesn't mean it meets the standard for a "true threat," in violation of the First Amendment.

"True threats are not protected speech but not everything is a true threat," David Hudson, professor at Belmont University School of Law, tells Reason. "This seems to me to be heated rhetorical hyperbole, which is an incredibly important concept—or should be—in true threat-type cases."

The U.S. Supreme Court created the true threat exception to the First Amendment in the 1969 decision Watts v. United States. Even then, Hudson adds, it made the point of distinguishing between true threats and "crude political hyperbole"—in that case, a protester's remark that if he were drafted into the Army, "the first man I want to get in my sights is" then-President Lyndon Johnson. The court agreed with the plaintiff that it was not a true threat but simply "a kind of very crude offensive method of stating a political opposition to the President."

"Suppression of speech as an effective police measure is an old, old device, outlawed by our Constitution," Justice William O. Douglas wrote in a concurring opinion.

Bushart's arrest would be humorous if it weren't so serious. He now faces a potential years-long prison sentence for reposting a Facebook meme that doesn't come anywhere close to qualifying as an exception to the First Amendment. Even if the case gets thrown out, he has already spent two weeks in jail and is set to spend two more months until his first hearing.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com