Discord 黑客事件显示了在线年龄验证的风险
Discord hack shows risks of online age checks

原始链接: https://news.sky.com/story/discord-hack-shows-dangers-of-online-age-checks-as-internet-policing-hopes-put-to-the-test-13447618

Discord最近宣布发生一起数据泄露事件,约影响7万用户,源于一起针对用于年龄验证的第三方服务的黑客攻击。虽然Discord平台本身没有受到损害,但黑客获得了用户提交的用于申诉年龄验证结果的身份证件照片。 被盗数据*可能*包括个人信息和部分信用卡号码,以及客户支持消息记录。但完整的信用卡详细信息和密码并未泄露。Discord已撤销该第三方的访问权限,并已通知受影响的用户,建议警惕可疑通信。 这起事件凸显了日益严格的在线年龄验证要求带来的安全风险,这些要求是由新的政府法规推动的。泄露发生的原因是第三方服务存储了提交的身份证件照片——专家建议完全避免这种做法,以最大限度地减少数据漏洞。黑客声称获取了更多数据,可能是一种敲诈勒索企图,但Discord对此表示异议。

## Discord 年龄验证漏洞:摘要 最近一起黑客攻击暴露了大约 7 万名经历过 Discord 年龄验证用户的个人数据。据报道,此次漏洞是通过向外包员工行贿 500 美元实现的,泄露了 Discord 保留的政府身份证件,引发了对数据安全和保留措施的担忧。 讨论的重点在于为什么身份证件没有被加密,以及为什么它们在验证的直接需求之外被保存了很长时间——可能长达数年。许多评论员质疑年龄验证本身的有效性,认为它将责任从父母转移到平台,并造成了重大的隐私风险。一些人建议使用替代方案,例如一些国家已经使用的可信身份系统。 这起事件凸显了公司处理敏感数据方面的更广泛问题,特别是关于外包员工和访问控制。人们对加密(如果存在)是否能有效防止内部泄露提出了担忧。最终,这次黑客攻击强调了在数字时代平衡安全法规与用户隐私的挑战。
相关文章

原文

Messaging platform Discord has said the official ID photos of around 70,000 users have been stolen by hackers.

The app, which is popular with gamers and teenagers, said the hackers targeted a firm responsible for verifying the ages of its users. Discord said its own platform was not breached.

The stolen data could include personal information, partial credit card numbers and messages with Discord's customer service agents, the firm said.

No full credit card details, passwords or messages and activity beyond conversations with Discord customer support were leaked, it added.

Discord said it had revoked the third-party service's access and was continuing to investigate. It said all affected users have been contacted.

"Looking ahead, we recommend impacted users stay alert when receiving messages or other communication that may seem suspicious," it said.

Until recently, a hack like this could not have happened, because companies had no need to process and collect proofs of age.

Now, so many governments are following the UK and introducing age verification for unsuitable or pornographic content that a company like Discord has to roll out age checks for a decent portion of its 200 million active users.

It's a bit like the way that shops have to check your age if you're buying alcohol - only because it's online, it comes with a lot of additional complications.

A shop, for instance, won't keep a copy of your passport once they've checked your age.

And it definitely won't keep it in a massive (yet strangely light) safe along with thousands of other passport photocopies, stored right by its front door, ready to be taken.

Online, it's surprisingly easy to do just that.

Read more on Sky News:
AI 'distorting women online'
Pros and cons of digital IDs
Impact of new online safety rules

It's worth noting that the age verification system used by Discord wasn't hacked itself. That system asked people to take a photo of themselves, then used software to estimate their age. Once the check was complete, the image was immediately deleted.

The problem came with the appeals part of the process, which was supplied to Discord by a third party.

If someone thought that the age verification system had wrongly barred them from Discord they could send in a picture of their ID to prove their age. This collection of images was hacked. As a result, Discord says, more than 70,000 IDs are now in the possession of hackers.

(The hackers themselves claim that the number is much bigger - 2,185,151 photos. Discord says this is wrong and the hackers are simply trying to extort money. It's a messy situation.)

There are ways to make age verification safer. Companies could stop storing photo ID, for instance (although then it would be impossible to know for sure if their checks were correct).

And advocates of ID cards will point out that a proper government ID could avoid the need to send pictures of your passport simply to prove your age. You'd use your digital ID instead, which would stay safely on your device.

But the best way to stop data being hacked is not to collect it in the first place.

We're at the start of a defining test - can governments actually police the internet? Or will the measures that are supposed to make us safer actually end up making us less secure?

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com