维基百科称,由于人工智能搜索摘要和社交视频,流量正在下降。
Wikipedia says traffic is falling due to AI search summaries and social video

原始链接: https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/18/wikipedia-says-traffic-is-falling-due-to-ai-search-summaries-and-social-video/

维基百科的人工页面浏览量正在下降(同比下降8%),这可能归因于生成式人工智能和社交媒体作为主要信息来源的兴起。维基媒体基金会发现,最近的大量流量来自试图模拟人类用户的机器人。 虽然人工智能搜索结果越来越多地*直接*提供答案,从而绕过维基百科等网站的链接,而且年轻用户更喜欢TikTok等平台,但基金会认为维基百科的内容仍然能够触达人们。然而,直接访问量减少会带来风险:可能影响志愿者贡献和捐款,而这些对维护百科全书至关重要。 维基百科正在适应,探索人工智能摘要(但因编辑担忧而暂停),并开发内容归属框架。他们也在积极寻找吸引新读者的途径,并强调支持原始来源和在线知识背后人类创作者的重要性。基金会敦促用户点击查看原始资料,并认识到人工策划信息的价值。

相关文章

原文

Wikipedia is often described as the last good website on an internet increasingly filled with toxic social media and AI slop. But it seems the online encyclopedia is not completely immune to broader trends, with human page views falling 8% year-over-year, according to a new blog post from Marshall Miller of the Wikimedia Foundation.

The foundation works to distinguish between traffic from humans and bots, and Miller writes that the decline “over the past few months” was revealed after an update to Wikipedia’s bot-detection systems appeared to show that “much of the unusually high traffic for the period of May and June was coming from bots that were built to evade detection.”

Why is traffic falling? Miller points to “the impact of generative AI and social media on how people seek information,” particularly as “search engines are increasingly using generative AI to provide answers directly to searchers rather than linking to sites like ours” and as “younger generations are seeking information on social video platforms rather than the open web.” (Google has disputed the claim that AI summaries reduce traffic from search.)

Miller says the foundation welcomes “new ways for people to gain knowledge” and argues this doesn’t make Wikipedia any less important, since knowledge sourced from the encyclopedia is still reaching people even if they don’t visit the website. Wikipedia even experimented with AI summaries of its own, though it paused the effort after editors complained.

But this shift does present risks, particularly if people are becoming less aware of where their information actually comes from. As Miller puts it, “With fewer visits to Wikipedia, fewer volunteers may grow and enrich the content, and fewer individual donors may support this work.” (Some of those volunteers are truly remarkable, reportedly disarming a gunman at a Wikipedia editors’ conference on Friday.)

For that reason, he argues that AI, search, and social companies using content from Wikipedia “must encourage more visitors” to the website itself.

And he says Wikipedia is taking steps of its own — for example, by developing a new framework for attributing content from the encyclopedia. The organization also has two teams tasked with helping Wikipedia reach new readers, and it’s looking for volunteers to help.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025

Miller also encourages readers to “support content integrity and content creation” more broadly.

“When you search for information online, look for citations and click through to the original source material,” he writes. “Talk with the people you know about the importance of trusted, human curated knowledge, and help them understand that the content underlying generative AI was created by real people who deserve their support.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com