吉卜力工作室、万代南梦宫、史克威尔艾尼克斯要求OpenAI停止使用其知识产权。
Studio Ghibli, Bandai Namco, Square Enix Demand OpenAI to Stop Using Their IP

原始链接: https://www.theverge.com/news/812545/coda-studio-ghibli-sora-2-copyright-infringement

日本版权所有者,由内容海外发行协会(CODA)代表——包括吉卜力工作室和万代南梦宫——要求OpenAI停止使用他们的知识产权来训练其AI模型,特别是Sora 2。CODA认为,机器 learning 过程中复制受版权保护的作品*构成*日本法律下的版权侵权,政府最近就日本艺术品向OpenAI提出的要求也支持这一立场。 该问题是在Sora 2发布后,平台上充斥着包含受版权保护的日本角色和风格的内容,这与之前GPT-4o的情况类似。虽然OpenAI宣布转向选择退出政策,但CODA认为这不足以解决问题,因为日本版权法通常要求*事先*获得许可才能使用。 CODA正在寻求对版权声明的“真诚”回应,并完全停止使用其成员的内容来训练AI,而不仅仅是删除侵权输出。

## 吉卜力工作室及其他公司 vs. OpenAI:摘要 吉卜力工作室、万代南梦宫和史克威尔艾尼克斯要求OpenAI停止使用他们的知识产权(IP)来训练其人工智能模型。 这引发了Hacker News上关于版权法、合理使用以及人工智能数据收集实践影响的激烈讨论。 许多评论员质疑对人工智能和个人用户适用的双重标准——虽然下载受版权保护的材料通常受到谴责,但OpenAI的大规模使用却存在争议。 一个关键的争论点是人工智能的“训练”是否构成受合理使用原则保护的转换性使用,或者直接侵权。 有人认为复制一种*风格*是可以允许的,但人工智能能够生成*特定创作者风格*的内容,可能会损害他们的市场,从而跨越了一条界限。 讨论还涉及在人工智能的背景下定义“转换性”的困难,以及可能发生的法律诉讼。 一些人预测OpenAI需要许可IP或面临限制,而另一些人则担心会发生类似于Napster的全面打击。 最终,这场辩论凸显了更新版权法以应对生成式人工智能带来的独特挑战的必要性。
相关文章

原文

The Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA), an anti-piracy organization representing Japanese IP holders like Studio Ghibli and Bandai Namco, released a letter last week asking OpenAI to stop using its members’ content to train Sora 2, as reported by Automaton. The letter states that “CODA considers that the act of replication during the machine learning process may constitute copyright infringement,” since the resulting AI model went on to spit out content with copyrighted characters.

Sora 2 generated an avalanche of content containing Japanese IP after it launched on September 30th, prompting Japan’s government to formally ask OpenAI to stop replicating Japanese artwork. This isn’t the first time one of OpenAI’s apps clearly pulled from Japanese media, either — the highlight of GPT-4o’s launch back in March was a proliferation of “Ghibli-style” images. Even Sam Altman’s own profile picture on X is currently a portrait in a style reminiscent of Studio Ghibli.

Altman announced last month that OpenAI will be changing Sora’s opt-out policy for IP holders, but CODA claims that the use of an opt-out policy to begin with may have violated Japanese copyright law, stating, “under Japan’s copyright system, prior permission is generally required for the use of copyrighted works, and there is no system allowing one to avoid liability for infringement through subsequent objections.”

CODA is now requesting on behalf of its members that OpenAI “responds sincerely” to its members’ copyright claims and stops using their content for machine learning without their permission, which seems to include not just Sora output, but also the use of Japanese IP as training data.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com