地铁三明治投掷者在华盛顿特区被陪审团判无罪。
Subway sandwich thrower found not guilty in D.C. jury rebuke

原始链接: https://www.npr.org/2025/11/06/nx-s1-5600772/trump-justice-federal-surge-subway-sandwich

肖恩·查尔斯·邓恩因于2025年8月在华盛顿特区向美国海关与边境保护局特工投掷潜艇三明治而被指控袭击联邦官员,但最终被判无罪。该事件发生在美国特朗普政府时期,联邦执法力量加强,许多居民对此持负面看法。 邓恩曾录像记录自己口头对抗这些官员,担心对一家同性恋夜总会进行移民突袭,他声称自己因批评而受到针对。虽然检方认为向执法人员投掷任何东西都是不可接受的,但邓恩的辩护方强调了该行为的无害性以及没有造成任何伤害——该特工穿着防弹背心。 此案成为了联邦部署紧张局势的象征,甚至在机构内部引发了幽默的反应,同事们赠送了该特工以三明治为主题的恶作剧礼物。邓恩在事件后失去了他在司法部的工作,他对判决结果表示欣慰。

华盛顿特区的一名男子向美国海关与边境保护局特工扔了一个潜艇三明治,最终被判无罪。尽管该特工声称三明治撞击时“爆炸”了(但没有造成受伤),但陪审团还是宣告该男子无罪,尽管检方最初试图以重罪指控他。 这起事件引发了评论区的争论,一些人认为该男子应该为袭击警察承担后果,并质疑可接受抗议的界限。另一些人则认为此案是政治骚扰,强调反应过度以及可能对异议的压制作用。 许多评论员指出,该特工最初的说法很可能是虚假的,因为证据显示三明治仍然包裹在地上。 一个关键主题是问责制中存在的 perceived 双重标准,一些人认为特工通常不会因更严重的行为而受到惩罚。 讨论还涉及对日益加剧的政治分歧以及当局过度扩张的担忧。
相关文章

原文

FBI and Border Patrol officers speak with Sean Charles Dunn, after he threw his sandwich at an officer, along the U Street corridor during a federal law enforcement deployment to the nation's capital on August 10, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Andrew Leyden/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Andrew Leyden/Getty Images

Not guilty. That was the finding of a jury on Thursday in the case of a man charged with assault for throwing his hoagie at a federal officer in Washington, D.C.

The jury's conclusion came after about seven hours of deliberations. The case of the Subway sandwich has come to symbolize how many in the nation's capital feel about the Trump administration's surge of federal law enforcement to the city.

A bystander's video captured Sean Charles Dunn in August calling federal officers racists and fascists. He thought they were about to do an immigration raid at a gay nightclub on Latin Night.

He also threw his Subway sandwich at Gregory Lairmore, an agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Lairmore, who was wearing a bulletproof vest, told jurors the sandwich exploded and he smelled onions and mustard — though he wasn't hurt. Dunn was later caught by police and fired from his job at the Justice Department.

The U.S. attorney's office in D.C. initially tried to charge Dunn with felony assault. When a grand jury failed to indict him on that charge, the case was downgraded to a misdemeanor charge for assaulting or impeding a federal officer. Prosecutors said Dunn went too far, and people should not be allowed to throw things at law enforcement.

Dunn argued that he was being singled out because of his criticism of the Trump administration. His lawyers also teased out the absurdity of the situation, arguing it was a harmless gesture that caused no harm or injury. Lairmore, who was wearing a bulletproof vest, admitted during the trial that he received gag gifts from colleagues, including a plush sandwich and a patch that says "Felony Footlong."

"I'm relieved and I'm looking forward to moving on with my life," Sean Charles Dunn said outside the courthouse on Thursday after the jury's verdict.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com