十二岁孩子眼中的教育科技的落空承诺。
A twelve-year-old on the failed promise of educational technology

原始链接: https://micahblachman.beehiiv.com/p/where-educational-technology-fails

学校利用教育技术监控学生在线活动的效果往往不佳,因为学生总能找到漏洞。虽然像Securly这样的工具可以屏蔽被标记的网站,但学生很快就能找到替代方法。合法的教育平台,如Scratch、Blooket,甚至教师创建的YouTube问答题集,都可以被用于游戏。 一旦游戏网站被访问,链接就会在学生中迅速传播。作者指出,仅仅屏蔽网站对IT部门来说就像一场持续且注定失败的战斗。他们认为,更有效的长期策略是教育学生负责任地使用技术,并与学生建立信任,同时仍然屏蔽真正不适宜的内容。虽然屏蔽对学校来说可能更容易,但它并不能解决根本问题,最终反而会鼓励学生寻找规避限制的方法。

一场 Hacker News 的讨论围绕一篇关于教育科技失败的文章展开,引发了关于如何改进学习的争论。 许多评论者认为,核心问题不在于*如何*进行教育(通过科技或不通过科技),而在于*教什么*以及如何让学习更具吸引力。一位用户建议将学习定义为“第二种乐趣”——虽然具有挑战性,但仍然有回报,而不是纯粹的娱乐。 其他人强调了教师在与科技巨头的吸引力竞争中面临的困境,并质疑当前系统专注于培养学生适应“资本主义的循环”。一位编程俱乐部教练分享了他们关于学生对游戏上瘾的经历,建议限制访问可能是最好的解决方案。这场对话最终指向了对更具吸引力的课程和对教育目标重新评估的需求。
相关文章

原文

Educational technology, specifically to monitor student activity, only works as long as it can keep up with the students. As someone who experiences these solutions in use every day, I can affirm that the loopholes might outnumber the blocked sites.

For example, some students might want to play video games during class. A school can make efforts to mitigate this, such as using a platform like Securly to automatically block sites flagged as games, but that only goes so far. A coding class at my school uses MIT’s Scratch to create simple games — which means that they have to unblock it, allowing kids access to any game on that site. Additionally, sites used by teachers for quiz games, such as Blooket and Gimkit, can be repurposed by students with “all-correct” question sets to be used as games. Thirdly, I’ve seen that when a game happens to be unblocked, the link spreads like wildfire from email account to email account. As one example, I know of an unblocked website with an embedded game inside that involved moving a truck through an obstacle course (it looked pretty boring to me, but I guess the bar is pretty low, no pun intended).

That’s not to say a school’s system is necessarily completely ineffective. Last year, my school had left unblocked the spammy-sounding Unblocked Games 66. It’s now blocked, but in a lot of ways, relying on IT to stay a step ahead of tech-savvy students seems like a recipe for ineffective policing.

Here’s something interesting: Even if a school blocks YouTube, there are educational tools teachers can use to create questions and those sites may well be unblocked. If you create a teacher account, you can watch any YouTube video even if the YouTube site itself is blocked.

Blocking sites just encourages kids to find loopholes and can only be a temporary solution. Schools should instead teach kids how to use technology responsibly and to trust the students at least somewhat — of course they should block actually inappropriate content. Is blocking easier for a school? — certainly. But is it actually better in the long run? — maybe not.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com