不要发布被动攻击性的网页。
Don't Post Passive-Aggressive Webpages

原始链接: https://dontpostpassiveaggressivewebpages.com/

## 停止讽刺:被动攻击性链接如何损害在线社区 “不要问如何问”或“让我谷歌一下”之类的链接经常在在线论坛中被用来回应被认为是不好的问题。虽然本意是鼓励自助和提出更好的问题,但这些链接几乎总是显得不屑一顾、令人羞愧且无益。 它们会扼杀对话,滋生怨恨,并营造出敌对的环境——特别是对于新手而言。尽管看似高效,发布这些链接往往比提供简短、直接的指导*更*费力。 文章提倡友善和建设性的沟通,而不是依赖这些被动攻击性的捷径。提供直接、礼貌的反馈,解释*为什么*提出清晰的问题有帮助,或者温和地建议搜索词。引用社区准则是可以的,但应该以友好的语气进行。 最终,通过友善和真诚的帮助培养协作精神,可以建立一个更强大、更有支持力的在线社区。

一个 Hacker News 的讨论围绕着网站“dontpostpassiveaggressivewebpages.com”,该网站讽刺性地强调了用类似“lmgtfy”(让我帮你谷歌一下)或旨在微妙羞辱提问者的链接来回复简单问题的做法。 虽然有些人认为这些链接*可能*旨在鼓励自助,但普遍的共识是它们主要用于羞辱和表达恼怒。评论员指出,礼貌的请求常常被忽略,导致人们诉诸这些被动攻击性的回应。另一些人批评在网上寻找解决方案时,却发现无益且居高临下的答案。 争论延伸到*所有*回复都需要有帮助的有效性,一些人为提供无益回复以回应恶意问题的权利辩护。最终,许多人同意,虽然诱人,但被动攻击很少能解决问题,而忽略或冷静地处理有问题的问题查询更有效。整个讨论中反复出现的一个笑话是讽刺性地建议该网站本身就是一个被动攻击行为。
相关文章

原文
Don't Post Passive-Aggressive Webpages

Let's talk about those links.

What Are We Talking About?

You've probably seen them. Links like dontasktoask.com, giybf.com, lmgtfy.com, or similar sites, often dropped in response to a question in online communities, especially tech or coding forums.

The intent behind these sites might stem from a desire to encourage better questions, promote self-sufficiency, or manage repetitive queries. However, the act of posting the link itself often comes across very differently.

The Vibe Check: How It Feels to Receive That Link

Let's be honest. Getting one of these links rarely feels like constructive feedback. More often, it feels:

  • Dismissive: It shuts down the conversation instead of guiding it.
  • Passive-Aggressive: It avoids direct communication in favour of a canned, often snarky, response delivered via URL.
  • Shaming: As one person put it:
    "To me it gives off the vibe of 'this question is so stupid and people have asked it so many times someone made a website just for stupid people like you.'"
  • Unhelpful: It doesn't offer "higher insight". It's just a statement, not tailored help.
  • Lazy (Ironically): While presented as enforcing effort from the asker, posting the link is often the least effort response from the helper, compared to offering genuine, brief guidance.
  • Counter-Productive: It can create a hostile or unwelcoming atmosphere ("Stack Overflow syndrome"), discouraging newcomers or those already struggling.

"It's Just Enforcement / Justifying the Rule!"

Some argue these links efficiently enforce community norms about asking questions well. While establishing good practices is valuable, using a passive-aggressive link is arguably one of the least effective ways to teach or enforce them kindly.

  • It lacks context: The link doesn't know the specific situation or the asker's background.
  • It breeds resentment: People learn better when they feel respected, not dismissed.
  • Direct communication is clearer: A simple, polite sentence is often more effective and less ambiguous.

How to Actually Help (Without the Snarky URL)

Instead of reaching for that bookmark, consider these approaches:

  1. Direct & Kind Guidance:
    • "Hey, it's usually best to ask your question directly! What's up?"
    • "Could you please share the full problem you're facing? It helps us help you faster."
    • "To give you the best answer, could you tell us what you've already tried?"
  2. Explain the 'Why' (Briefly & Politely):
    • "Asking directly helps because multiple people might see it and jump in to help!"
    • "Providing details upfront saves back-and-forth and gets you answers quicker."
  3. Gentle Nudge Towards Searching (If Appropriate):
    • "Have you tried searching for [specific error message or term]? Often there are quick solutions online." (Avoid LMGTFY links!)
  4. Quote the Rule/Guideline (If Applicable & Necessary):
    • If your community has guidelines, politely refer to the specific helpful section along with a welcoming tone.
  5. Just Be Nicer:
    • Remember the goal is usually collaboration and help. As someone mentioned, "this isn't stackoverflow, be nice to people." Put a kinder phrase in your mental (or actual) bookmarks!

Let's Build Better Conversations

Dropping a link to a passive-aggressive webpage might feel like a shortcut to dealing with certain types of questions, but it often damages the tone of the conversation and the community spirit.

Choose direct communication. Choose kindness. Choose to actually help or guide, even if it takes a few extra seconds to type.

In short: Don't post passive-aggressive webpages.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com