拆除闲置停车场,植树造林
Tear up unused parking lots, plant trees

原始链接: https://danrodricks.com/2024/01/29/tear-up-unused-parking-lots-plant-trees/

当然! 以下是基于丹·罗德里克斯 (Dan Rodricks) 之前发表的文章“拆除未使用的停车场,种植树木”的文章创意: 标题:从枯萎到美丽:通过重新造林改变空置的城市景观 简介:在世界各地的城市中,空地常常变成枯萎病——被忽视的混凝土或贫瘠的土地。 虽然这些地区曾经是主要的房地产机会,但如今,由于缺乏绿地和碳排放,这些景观严重加剧了污染问题。 然而,这些城市空隙也是宝贵的资产。 其中一些具有隐藏的潜力; 它们可以成为可持续社区中心的理想地点,人们聚集在一起交流思想、共享资源并增强抵御气候变化影响的能力。 其他的可以作为开放的绿地,以改善社区健康并提供休闲场所。 本文建议将这些地块从无用的地标转变为有用的生活空间,同时恢复因森林砍伐而丧失的生态系统服务。 正文:通过在这些土地上种植树木,重新造林的城市公园将有助于吸收温室气体排放,创建自然冷却区,改善空气质量水平,净化水径流,促进流域管理,恢复本土野生动物物种的栖息地,保护鸟类迁徙走廊和蝴蝶 繁殖地、振兴授粉媒介途径、改善土壤条件、支持农林业系统、促进粮食安全成果、增加薪材库存、提供防洪能力、完善消防安全标准、提高渔业产量、培育农业生产力、提高园艺利润、建立苗圃、扩大 花园、收获丰收、出售剩余物、种植绿色植物、保存苗木、加强社会资本、刺激可持续发展目标、产生基层创新举措、孵化创意企业、激发创收战略、培养当地社区与外国投资者之间的合作、建立公平的分配机制,刺激经济多元化,加速生态现代化进程,扩大可持续都市农业模式,并增强人类住区的可持续性。 结论:只要发挥一点创意、制定战略愿景并认真执行,世界各地的城市就可以将闲置的城市景观地产转变为充满活力的生活空间,注入生机,促进生计,维护社会经济稳定和繁荣,保护自然遗产,改善环境 指标

我还没有发现任何证据表明某些城市的公园过多或过剩。 然而,一些批评者反对在城市范围内创造过多的绿地,因为这可能会导致城市边界不必要的扩张,损害城市的整体紧凑性,导致密度降低,使公共交通更具挑战性并降低效率。 此外,维护过多的绿地需要大量的资源和资金投入,一些人建议可以更好地将这些资源和资金分配给其他基本功能,如住房、医疗设施、学校、图书馆、社会福利、就业机会、文化中心、娱乐场所、 研究机构、教育项目、科学实验室、医疗诊所、紧急服务机构、警察局和监狱。 因此,许多城市规划者主张在全面分析、战略规划和负责任的管理的基础上实施有针对性的绿色基础设施方法和方法,以最大限度地减少浪费投资,并确保每个公园地点的预期功能和服务模式达到最佳性能。
相关文章

原文

The photo to the right is of the Staples parking lot behind the York Road store in Baltimore, a classic example of a place that needs to be turned back to urban forest — or developed into a much-needed something else. I can’t think of a time when, during fairly frequent trips to this store, I saw more than a dozen vehicles in the long, large lot. And, if you keep it top-of-mind as you travel, you see this sort of thing in many urban and suburban places. As I just suggested in my Sun column, Baltimore and the surrounding counties should conduct a “useless parking lot inventory” to identify all impervious surfaces, public or private, that are either no longer needed or too large for their current use. Retail shopping centers in decline, abandoned industrial buildings — remove the unnecessary asphalt and plant some trees. Or do something constructive with this unused, paved space — new housing, a solar energy field.

Part of this is a result of poor planning and ordinance-making that long ago overcompensated for the wide use of automobiles. Henry Grabar, a staff writer at Slate, mentions this in a book published last year, Paved Paradise: How Parking Explains the World. ”On a national level, certainly, there’s far more parking than we need,” Grabar said in an interview. “There are at least four parking spaces for every car, meaning that the parking stock is no more than 25 percent full at any given time. And some of those cars are moving at any given time, so parking may be a good deal emptier than that.”

I don’t know that anyone besides Grabar is even thinking about this, because parking lots are so deeply embedded in the American psyche, in the environment we take for granted. But certain changes to how we live and work — the demise of malls and the decline of brick-and-mortar retail, the advance of telecommuting in the wake of the pandemic — must have diminished the need for all that asphalt. And all that asphalt effects both human health and the health of the planet.

Dan Rodricks is a long-time columnist for The Baltimore Sun, winner of numerous national and regional journalism awards, a radio and TV personality, podcaster and fly angler. His narrative memoir, "Father's Day Creek," was published in May 2019 by Apprentice House at Loyola University Maryland.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com