维克多·戴维斯·汉森宣布“气候变化的终结”
Victor Davis Hanson Proclaims "The End Of Climate Change"

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/victor-davis-hanson-proclaims-end-climate-change

数十年来的气候变化“正统”正面临来自不断演变的经济、技术和地缘政治因素的挑战,特别是人工智能的大量能源需求。虽然之前曾要求彻底转向可再生能源,但人们对温度记录的不一致和自然气候周期日益怀疑。 人工智能前所未有的电力需求——每年需要相当于100座千瓦级发电厂的电力——需要像核能或化石燃料这样可靠的能源,超过了可再生能源的能力。这种转变反映在公众的质疑中,例如瑞典国王和比尔·盖茨,后者现在对迫在眉睫的气候危机表示怀疑。 此外,气候倡导者中 perceived 的虚伪行为也削弱了这一叙事,例如尽管有海平面上升的警告,但仍投资于沿海房地产。维克多·戴维斯·汉森认为,这种不一致性,加上缺乏对彻底经济转型的经验证据,表明人工智能的能源需求可能会从根本上改变气候变化的话题。

相关文章

原文

Decades of 'consensus' around so-called climate catastrophe are now running into new economic, technological, and geopolitical realities.

Mix in AI and its unprecedented demand for large-scale electricity generation, and we have a global climate conversation that demands to be reckoned with.

Victor Davis Hanson breaks down how the foundations of decades of “green orthodoxy” are shifting:

For decades, the narrative demanded radical economic shifts from fossil fuels to renewables like wind and solar, but recent skepticism is growing due to inconsistencies in temperature records and cyclical changes; Hanson notes, "I didn't think in my lifetime that I would see an end to that dominance, even though there were inconsistencies."

Artificial intelligence requires unprecedented electricity, far beyond what wind and solar can provide, necessitating 100 gigawatt plants annually equivalent to nuclear or fossil fuels; as Hanson cites Sam Altman, "we're going to have to build 100 [one gigawatt plants] per year or the equivalent of clean coal or natural gas."

Figures like Sweden's King Gustaf XVI and Bill Gates have publicly questioned the crisis, while Trump's energy policies end subsidies for failed green projects like California's high-speed rail; Hanson highlights Gates' recent pivot, "he no longer believes that there is an impending climate change crisis."

Elite hypocrisy is everywhere as Hanson notes “the people who have been the avatars of climate change, never suffer the consequences of their own ideology."

"Barack Obama said the planet would be inundated pretty soon, if we didn't address global climate change. Why would he buy a seaside estate at Martha's Vineyard or one on the beach of Hawaii if he really did believe that the oceans would rise and flood his multimillion-dollar investment?

“The inconsistency of the global warming narrative, the self-interest in the people who promote it, and the logic that they have not presented, empirically, any evidence that would convince us that we have to radically transform our economies," leaves Hanson questioning whether AI's demand shift has permanently crushed the ideology of so-called 'climate change.'

(0:00) Introduction

(0:58) Shifting Perspectives on Climate Change

(2:28) Global Skepticism

(5:12) Geopolitical Factors

(6:16) Third World Demands

(8:30) Hypocrisy Among Climate Change Advocates

(9:49) Conclusion

Watch the full breakdown here...

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com