年龄限制的互联网正在席卷美国。活动家们正在反击。
The Age-Gated Internet Is Sweeping the US. Activists Are Fighting Back

原始链接: https://www.wired.com/story/age-verification-is-sweeping-the-us-activists-are-fighting-back/

国会目前正在审议19项在线安全法案,包括《儿童在线安全法案》(KOSA),其中许多法案强制要求年龄验证才能访问在线内容。这种立法激增——现在已在美国半数州成为法律,并在全球范围内获得进展,英国和澳大利亚也有相关法律——引发了数字权利组织(如Fight for the Future)的担忧。 他们认为,这些法案,要求上传身份证或生物识别扫描,将会增加审查和监控,而不是真正保护儿童。担忧还包括数据隐私、家长控制,以及第三方验证服务容易发生泄露的可能性。 Fight for the Future 强调公众舆论与国会山上的认知之间存在脱节——公众普遍对这些措施持否定态度,而国会认为它们代表着“常识”政策。他们认为这些法律是对民主自由的威胁,并将它们与针对医疗保健获取和信息的限制性立法相提并论。

美国日益增长的网络年龄验证趋势引发了争论,正如《连线》杂志最近的一篇文章所强调。这种为了保护儿童免受色情内容侵害而推动的访问在线内容验证措施,正引发对隐私和追踪的担忧。 Hacker News上的讨论表明,人们对这种推广的自然性表示怀疑,评论者质疑潜在的资金来源和政治影响。虽然许多人同意应该保护儿童免受有害内容的影响,但对于最佳方法存在分歧。 一些人认为家长监控是关键,但承认其难度。另一些人则提出了技术解决方案,例如利用IPv4“邪恶位”来标记成人内容,或将互联网访问限制在受控的桌面环境中。一个核心问题是,网络年龄验证可能并非为了保护,而是为了增加政府的监控能力。
相关文章

原文

Members of Congress considered 19 online safety bills Tuesday that may soon have a major impact on the future of the internet as age-verification laws have spread to half of the US and around the world.

In response, digital and human rights organization Fight for the Future is hosting a week of events—across Reddit, LinkedIn, and various livestreams—to raise awareness of how it believes these bills are setting a dangerous precedent by making the internet more exploitative rather than safer. Many of the proposed bills include a clause for ID or age verification, which forces people to upload an ID, allow a face scan, or otherwise authenticate that they are not a minor before viewing adult content. Fight for the Future says the policies will lead to increased censorship and surveillance.

Among the 19 bills considered at the hearing conducted by the House Energy and Commerce Committee was the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which passed with sweeping bipartisan approval in the Senate last year, and the Reducing Exploitative Social Media Exposure for Teens Act, which would ban tech companies from allowing minors under the age of 16 on their platforms. In addition to age verification, the bills raised concerns over issues of parental controls, consumer research of minors, AI, and data privacy.

“We’re seeing this huge wave toward ID checks being the norm in tech policy, and it felt like we needed to capture the already activated communities who are not feeling heard in Congress,” says Sarah Philips, a campaigner with Fight for the Future. “If you look on YouTube, if you see people making content about KOSA or responding to a lot of this legislation, it’s very unpopular with people. But it’s viewed on the Hill as very common-sense.”

Missouri’s age-gate law took effect earlier this week, meaning 25 US states have passed a form of age verification. The process usually involves third-party services, which can be especially prone to data breaches. This year, the UK also passed a mandate for age verification—the Online Safety Act—and Australia’s teen social media ban, which requires social media companies to deactivate the accounts of users under the age of 16, goes into effect on December 10. Instagram, YouTube, Snap, and TikTok are complying with the historic ban.

Philips believes the laws are a direct threat to democratic freedom. “These are censorship laws,” she says. “In the South, where I live, these same proposals mimic a lot of the arguments that you see behind book bans and behind laws that criminalize gender-affirming health care or abortion information.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com