TikTok 非法追踪你的购物习惯,以及你使用约会应用程序的情况。
TikTok unlawfully tracks shopping habits and use of dating apps?

原始链接: https://noyb.eu/en/tiktok-unlawfully-tracks-your-shopping-habits-and-your-use-dating-apps

TikTok因涉嫌非法追踪用户在*其他应用程序*内的活动而受到审查,这通过用户的数据访问请求得以揭示。该请求显示,TikTok通过追踪公司AppsFlyer获得了用户使用Grindr的数据——泄露了他性取向的敏感信息。这违反了GDPR,特别是对敏感数据的保护(第9条)和透明度要求(第12条和第15条)。 TikTok最初隐瞒了这些信息,并提供了一个不完整的“下载工具”用于数据访问,未能提供完整的个人数据副本,这在法律上是必需的。 数据保护组织noyb已在奥地利对TikTok、AppsFlyer和Grindr提起了投诉。这些投诉指控非法数据处理、数据共享缺乏法律依据以及违反GDPR。noyb要求TikTok提供完整数据,并要求这三家公司停止非法处理,同时可能处以罚款以阻止未来的违规行为。这凸显了TikTok收集超出其平台范围的广泛数据,以构建详细用户画像的令人担忧的趋势。

Hacker News 新闻 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 TikTok 非法追踪你的购物习惯——以及你使用约会应用的情况 (noyb.eu) 16 分,由 doener 发表于 38 分钟前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 1 条评论 grugagag 发表于 6 分钟前 [–] 其他所有社交媒体很可能也在这样做。虽然 TikTok 造成的危害不容小觑,但遗憾的是这是一种行业普遍现象。也不应忘记监控、虚假信息、操纵选举等等。回复 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

Unlawful tracking across apps. It’s no secret that TikTok is rather data hungry. After all, the popular video platform’s algorithm seems to know exactly what content users want to see. However, it’s not well known that TikTok also tracks you while using other apps. A user found out about this unlawful tracking practice through an access request – which showed that e.g. his usage of Grindr was sent to TikTok, likely via the Israeli tracking company AppsFlyer - which allows TikTok to draw conclusions about his sexual orientation and sex life. This is specially protected data under Article 9 GDPR, which can only be processed in exceptional cases. TikTok initially even withheld this information from the user, which violates Article 15 GDPR. Only after repeated inquiries, TikTok revealed that it knows which apps he used, what he did within these apps (for example adding a product to the shopping cart) - and that this data also included information about his usage of the gay dating app Grindr.

Kleanthi Sardeli, data protection lawyer at noyb: “Like many of its US counterparts, TikTok increasingly collects data from other apps and sources. This allows the Chinese app to gain a full picture of people’s online activity. The fact that data from another app revealed this user’s sexual orientation and sex life is just one of the more extreme examples.”

Accomplices in unlawful data processing. TikTok was only able to receive this information with the help of the Israeli data company AppsFlyer and Grindr itself. AppsFlyer most likely functions as a kind of intermediary, which receives the sensitive data about the complainant from Grindr and then passed it on to TikTok. The problem: Neither AppsFlyer nor Grindr have a valid legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR to share the complainant’s personal data with third parties such as TikTok. And they most certainly don’t have any valid reason to share his sensitive data under Article 9(1) GDPR. At no point in time did the complainant consent to the sharing of his data.

Insufficient reply to access request. Users should generally be informed about the recipients of personal data and even get a copy of said data. However, TikTok seems to structurally violate the users’ right to get such a copy. TikTok refers its users to a “download tool”, but later admitted that this tool only holds what it deems the most “relevant” data – and by far not all personal data. Even after repeated inquiries to add the missing information, TikTok didn’t provide information about which data is being processed and for what purpose.  By doing so, TikTok clearly violates Articles 12 and 15 GDPR, which require companies to provide the information in full and in an easily understandable format.                                                                                         

Lisa Steinfeld, data protection lawyer at noyb: “TikTok directs its users to an inherently incomplete ‘download tool’. It’s fair to assume that thousands of users were sent to this scam tool, which structurally doesn’t comply with the legal requirements to provide a full copy of one’s own personal data.”

Complaints filed in Austria. noyb has therefore filed two complaints with the Austrian data protection authority (DSB). The first complaint is against TikTok and revolves around the incomplete reply to the complainant’s access request. The second complaint is against TikTok, AppsFlyer and Grindr and deals with the undefined processing of off-TikTok data, the lack of a valid legal basis for the data sharing and processing and the violation of Article 9(1) GDPR. We request TikTok to provide the complainant with the missing information and all three companies to stop the unlawful processing of his personal data. Last but not least, we suggest that the authority impose an “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” fine under Article 83 GDPR to prevent similar violations in the future.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com