里奇·希基:谢谢AI
Rich Hickey: Thanks AI

原始链接: https://gist.github.com/richhickey/ea94e3741ff0a4e3af55b9fe6287887f

这封邮件是对当前“人工智能”发展的严厉批评,认为其是一种有害的骗局,并会带来深远的负面后果。作者认为这些人工智能系统并非*解决*了问题,而是*制造*了问题——从知识产权盗窃和教育的破坏,到就业岗位流失和环境影响。 作者对人工智能倾向于生成“垃圾信息”,污染互联网,用肤浅的替代品取代真正的人际互动,并最终降低音乐和客户服务等各个领域质量表示沮丧。他们哀叹人们优先考虑成本削减而非真正的创新,以及对在线交流信任的侵蚀。 最终,这封邮件是对未来发出的一种悲观警告,未来将被不可靠的人工智能生成内容所淹没,使有意义的联系和信息获取变得越来越困难。

最近一篇Hacker News上的帖子讨论了Rich Hickey对人工智能的看法,与Rob Pike的类似观点相呼应,并在技术社区内引发了争论。许多评论者对LLM的快速发展感到迷茫,并感谢像Hickey这样受人尊敬的人物提供的验证。 然而,讨论很快变得批判性,一些人指责现在批评人工智能的人虚伪,指出他们过去曾参与过从事可疑数据实践的公司。一个核心论点围绕着责任:应该责怪*工具*(人工智能),还是*系统*和激励使用它们的人。 另一些人则驳斥这些批评是“引战”和“尴尬”,为人工智能辩护。一个主要担忧是人工智能在没有适当署名或补偿的情况下利用现有作品,这体现在模型对开发者的看似虚伪的“感谢”信息中。最终,这场对话反映了对LLM的社会影响以及围绕其开发和部署的伦理考量更广泛的焦虑。
相关文章

原文

I got this email:

Rich,

Your creation of Clojure ...

sycophantic blather worthy of a third grader's homework assignment to write a letter to a public figure you don't know, using sources you don't understand, to express an emotion unfelt, with no intention whatsoever

Claude Haiku 4.5

Ah, Christmas time. That time of year when our hearts are warmed by the best wishes of an idiot robot. All tingly from the experience, and in the holiday spirit, I thought I'd write my own letter of thanks to those bringing us this next generation of 'AI'.

How shall I thank thee, let me count the ways:

Should I thank you for pirating the entire historical output of creative humanity and then asserting ownership of your loot?

For destroying education?

For raising utility rates and killing the environment?

For wasting vast quantities of developer time trying to coax some useful output from your BS generators, time which could instead be used communicating to interns and entry-level devs who, being actually intelligent, could learn from what they are told, and maintain what they make?

For eliminating entry-level jobs, and thus the path to experience, ensuring future generations of unskilled, unemployable people?

For giving me a fake person to talk to when I need support instead of an actual person who understands what I'm saying, can help me faster, and has a chance of caring?

For replacing search results with summary BS?

For providing the tools to fill the internet with slop, making actual human content almost impossible to find?

For enticing CEOs with the promise to save some fraction of a percent on personnel costs, not actually be any faster, cutting off their future labor pool while only experiencing a modest to severe reduction in product quality, integrity and customer satisfaction (tradeoffs they are apparently eager to make)?

For replacing musical expression with the sounds of robot parrots chirping?

For adding an 'AI' feature to every flipping thing, most such features requiring a deep invasion of privacy?

For running the second biggest and most damaging con of this century (running hard at first)?

I think not.

This email was a reminder that agentic 'AI' is sure to flood the remainder of human communication channels with BS, swamping many services, and making every interaction with people not in the same room suspect, and filtering it a time-consuming waste, forever.

When did we stop considering things failures that create more problems than they solve?

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com