法律搜索60%以无点击结束
60% of Legal Searches Now End Without a Click

原始链接: https://talk24.ai/blog/ai-killing-legal-search

## 法律客户获取格局的变化 律师事务所严重依赖谷歌获取客户,正面临一个关键挑战:由于谷歌的AI概览,网站流量大幅下降。目前,60%的法律搜索没有点击进入律师事务所的网站,预计到2026年中期,这一数字将达到70-80%。 2025年的数据显示,中位规模的事务所经历了19%的流量下降,一些事务所的降幅高达80%,尽管搜索展示量保持稳定。AI概览直接回答用户查询,减少了访问网站的需求。这正在推高广告成本——人身伤害关键词的平均点击成本现在超过500美元,甚至超过1000美元,同时回报也在减少。 城市地区的律师事务所受到的影响尤为严重。 “投入更多,排名更高,获得更多点击”的旧策略已经失效。重点正在从传统的SEO转向**生成引擎优化 (GEO)**——通过准确的数据、一致的在线形象和权威的内容来优化AI引用。 成功的律师事务所正在多元化获取渠道(视频、社区参与、品牌建设),并优先考虑直接客户联系,在谷歌搜索*之外*创造需求。适应这一新现实对于在快速发展的法律市场中生存至关重要。

## 搜索点击量下降与人工智能答案的兴起 一项最新趋势显示,60%的法律搜索现在*不*会点击传统的搜索结果,这主要是由于潜在客户生成公司利用激进的SEO策略,用低质量的内容(例如汽车经销商出现在汽车维修搜索中)淹没结果。用户对缺乏真正有用的信息感到沮丧。 然而,人工智能驱动的搜索的兴起——通过Perplexity等工具,Google的AI概览,甚至巧妙地利用LLM——提供了一种解决方案。这些工具为复杂的查询提供直接、量身定制的答案,减少了筛选SEO垃圾信息的需求。 虽然有些人担心未来会出现人工智能驱动的SEO垃圾信息,但用户目前正受益于更高效的信息检索。这种转变挑战了现有的SEO驱动的商业模式,可能迫使公司重新思考他们的策略,甚至可能复兴较旧的方法,如目录列表。最终,这一趋势表明,人们正在转向更直接的答案,而传统的SEO“点击诱饵”的效果正在下降。
相关文章

原文

60% of legal searches now end without anyone clicking through to a website.

Google's AI Overviews answer questions like "what to do after a car accident" right there on the results page. No click needed. By mid-2026, that number is expected to hit 70-80%.

For law firms that built their entire client acquisition strategy on Google, this is an existential shift.

The data from 2025 tells the story clearly.

Legal searches ending without a click: 60% today, 70-80% by mid-2026

That's not a gradual decline. It's a collapse in progress.

The Traffic Numbers Are Brutal

According to QS Digital's analysis of the legal sector in 2025, the median law firm saw website traffic drop 19%. Some firms experienced declines of nearly 80%.

The strange part: impressions stayed flat. Firms were still appearing in search results. Users just weren't clicking through anymore.

Why? Because the answer was already on the page. AI Overviews provide summaries, suggest next steps, and even curate lists of attorneys. The user makes their decision before visiting a single website.

Surefire Local reports that when AI Overviews appear, top-ranking pages see a 34.5% drop in click-through rates. Being #1 on Google used to guarantee traffic. Not anymore.

Meanwhile, Costs Keep Climbing

Here's the painful irony: while traffic drops, the cost to compete for what's left keeps rising.

Personal injury lawyers are paying 568% more per click than they did in 2021. The keyword "Las Vegas personal injury attorneys" costs $500 per click. Some legal keywords have crossed $1,000.

iLawyer Marketing's 2025 analysis shows this isn't limited to a few high-competition terms. The entire legal advertising category is experiencing cost inflation while delivering diminishing returns.

The math is simple: higher costs, lower traffic, same conversion rates. ROI is collapsing.

Urban Firms Are Hit Hardest

The QS Digital data shows geographic patterns in the decline. Urban firms experienced larger drops and more volatility than rural practices.

This makes sense. Metropolitan markets have more competition, more sophisticated searchers, and more queries that AI can confidently answer. When someone in Los Angeles searches "what to do after a rideshare accident," the AI has plenty of training data to provide a direct answer.

Rural firms, with less competition and more unique local queries, saw more stability. But the trend is moving in one direction everywhere.

The Playbook Is Breaking

The model that built firms like Morgan & Morgan relied on a simple formula: spend more on advertising than competitors, dominate search results, capture the lion's share of leads.

That model assumed clicks would follow rankings. It assumed traffic would follow impressions. Neither assumption holds anymore.

Martindale-Avvo's State of the Legal Consumer 2026 report describes the shift: "The linear path of 'search, click, call' is being replaced by 'ask and chat.'"

Potential clients interact with AI that summarizes answers, curates attorney lists, and validates expertise. They might hire a lawyer without ever visiting that lawyer's website.

SEO Is Becoming GEO

The industry is coining a new term: Generative Engine Optimization (GEO).

Traditional SEO optimized for Google's algorithm. GEO optimizes for AI systems. The goal isn't ranking #1. It's getting cited by AI.

Different signals matter now. Structured data that AI can parse. Consistent NAP (name, address, phone) across directories. Reviews and reputation signals that LLMs can verify. Being mentioned in sources that AI models were trained on.

Firms that embraced accuracy, consistency, and community presence retained visibility in 2025. Those that relied purely on traditional SEO saw declines even when nothing changed about their websites.

What Actually Works Now

Three shifts that firms making the transition are prioritizing:

1. Diversify acquisition channels.

Firms that relied 100% on Google are getting crushed. Winners are building presence across video (YouTube, TikTok), community involvement, direct brand recognition, and AI-native discovery platforms.

2. Optimize for AI citation, not just ranking.

Ensure your firm's information is accurate and consistent everywhere. Claim and verify all directory listings. Build the kind of authoritative content that AI models reference when answering legal questions.

3. Capture demand that bypasses search entirely.

The fastest-growing intake channel is direct contact from people who already know your name. Brand building, referral systems, and community presence create demand that doesn't depend on Google at all.

The Bottom Line

The $500/click game is a tax on firms that haven't adapted.

Google search isn't going away. But its role as the dominant intake channel is diminishing. The firms that thrive in 2026 and beyond will be those that recognized this shift early and diversified before they had to.

The data is clear. The question is whether your firm will adapt proactively or wait until the numbers force a change.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com