我就不参加你的Zoom会议了。
I'll pass on your zoom call

原始链接: https://operand.online/chronicle/pass.zoom

这篇内容强烈质疑流行的视频会议平台(如Zoom),并提倡使用开源替代方案(如Jitsi)。作者认为,在没有公开可供审查的代码的情况下,关于安全性的声明,特别是端到端加密,毫无意义。 作者指出,2025年出现了一个转变,即依赖大型科技公司来保障数据安全变得不可行。他们提到Zoom的分层隐私政策——为付费组织提供比普通用户更好的保护。作者本人是一名程序员,承认存在被滥用的可能性,但将自己的道德方法与大型平台的数据饥渴行为形成对比。 为了保护自己的隐私,作者使用虚拟机和外部硬件,在通话期间主动阻止访问敏感数据。他们敦促读者了解Zoom广泛的数据收集行为,并通过对其服务条款的详细分析来了解,并优先选择尊重用户隐私和控制权的平台。最终,作者倡导一个将维护个人秘密置于一切之上价值的未来。

一个黑客新闻的讨论围绕着Zoom的安全性和用户体验。最初的帖子表达了对使用Zoom的犹豫。 评论者指出Zoom历史上安全问题频发,提到了过去的问题,例如允许远程管理员访问的localhost漏洞,以及在疫情期间迅速普及时存在的初始安全漏洞。尽管Zoom收购了一个加密安全团队,但怀疑仍然存在。 用户讨论了替代方案,例如使用浏览器版本(尽管存在一种“暗模式”会劝退用户),以及使用安全的文件共享来补充通话,以处理敏感信息。一些人质疑Zoom的数据收集行为,认为所有电脑音频都可能被录制。 对话也出现了一些愤世嫉俗的观点,一位评论员认为发帖者只是不想与他人互动,另一位则强调了对技术的普遍不信任。
相关文章

原文

In 2026, there are some amazing programs being made by genius coders, who are happy to hand out their code for free so that people can be sure of their security.

One such program is Jitsi - their biggest offense in my book is their name, which is hard to say is or is not really offensive.

This group of coders made all good decisions. One, they open-sourced their code so that people can be sure of their security.

Using the in-browser model familiar to anyone who has used Google Meet, you can be sure that you are able to manage the permissions that the app is asking for from your machine; microphone, sure! camera, maybe another day. files, hell no! Because you already are using a browser now, you know you can be on any call in a couple quick clicks.

People say Zoom is secure, but nobody knows this! Any app that claims to be end-to-end encrypted needs to share their code if they aim for their claim to be credible. In 2025, the rulebook changed in many crucial places; if we are unable to rely on our health insurance companies to keep our records secure, who seriously imagines that unimaginably young, unimaginably rich coders are going to handle the vault keys properly?

...and, they don't even claim to! Reading through their policies, you only have to go a few paragraphs before you see that they group their users into two camps; their super-special paying organizations, which have the threat of legal action on their side, and the large mass of casual users, who share reunions, medical discussions, holiday celebrations, and phone sex.

Coders are creeps!

Yes, I am also a creep. Of course I am! I code online! And I know precisely how much I could access if I cared to look. The difference is that I'm a smidge more scientific, much more self-obsessed, and uphold a really unique philosophy around commercial success.

To me, success in 2026 is being able to keep a goddamn secret! Is being able to choose which business you share, and which you share with specific people!

So, I'm going to pass on your creepy-ass Zoom calls! If there's one that I really need to be on, I'm going to spin up a VM on my computer so that it has no idea of the other files laying around, such as my ~/passcodes.csv. If you are such a negligent bullhead as to get me onto your call, you'll be unable to see me because my VM cannot access my camera! By design! Same for my microphone, so I'll plug in a USB mic if I really need to speak up. More likely than not though, I'm exhausted by now. I'll spend the full duration of the call eeking a small echo of pleasure from the continuation of this rambling alarm, for your sheepish audience to rub their enablist shame in.

And if we're really lucky, we'll still have something to talk about by the end, so I'll follow along to your marginally-less harmful Slack or Discord channels, where I'll keep. name. dropping. Jitsi.

Please remember that our holier-than-health Zoom took the world by storm in the middle of a panicked response to an airborne toxic event!

No one read the conditions back then, and those conditions have changed on numerous occasions - each - year - since then.

Here's where those conditions are now, according to ToS;DR. There are so many angry red data horrors that the following green "You maintain ownership of your data" is seriously the most disrespectful sentence I have ever come across. That's so goddamnfuckingbumasshurt meaningless!

Here's some big ones:

  • This service may collect, use, and share location data
  • This service gives your personal data to third parties involved in its operation
  • This service may keep personal data after a request for erasure for business interests or legal obligations
  • The service may sell your data unless you opt out
  • This service forces users into binding arbitration in the case of disputes
  • The service may use tracking pixels, web beacons, browser fingerprinting, and/or device fingerprinting on users.
  • This service gathers information about you through third parties
  • You waive your right to a class action.
  • Your personal data may be used for marketing purposes
  • Instead of asking directly, this Service will assume your consent merely from your usage.
  • The service uses your personal data to employ targeted third-party advertising
  • This service gives your personal data to third parties involved in its operation
  • Your data may be processed and stored anywhere in the world
  • Any liability on behalf of the service is only limited to the fees you paid as a user

Many of the "green thumbs" are meaningless when combined alongside the red alarms. Compare:

  • You can request access, correction and/or deletion of your data
  • This service may keep personal data after a request for erasure for business interests or legal obligations

If you really need to see me so exposed, find me at the local sex club. If you need me on board for your cause, begin securing your business.

Goddamn.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com