一位著名的研究人员掩盖了婴儿中毒事件吗?
Did a celebrated researcher obscure a baby's poisoning?

原始链接: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/02/02/did-a-celebrated-researcher-obscure-a-fatal-poisoning

## 塔里克·杰米森的悲剧 & 可待因安全 像可待因这样的阿片类药物会抑制呼吸,不幸的是,看似安全的剂量对婴儿塔里克·杰米森来说却是致命的。他的母亲拉尼被处方可待因来缓解产后疼痛,却不知不觉地通过母乳传递了致命的剂量。 领先的儿科医生和毒理学家吉迪恩·科伦进行了调查,发现拉尼拥有罕见的遗传特征——多了一份基因拷贝,导致她的肝脏迅速将可待因转化为高浓度的吗啡。 塔里克的吗啡水平非常高,超过了安全呼吸的阈值。 科伦随后发表在《柳叶刀》上的研究表明,高达40%的哺乳期母亲可能像拉尼一样是“超快速代谢者”,从而使她们的婴儿面临风险。这一发现促使卫生监管部门迅速采取行动,在可待因包装上发出警告,并转向开具替代止痛药。 杰米森一家对制药公司提起了集体诉讼,旨在防止类似的悲剧发生。 尽管失去塔里克的痛苦依然存在,但他们的案件促使阿片类药物安全指南发生了关键变化,强调了基因检测和个性化医疗在产后护理中的重要性。 科伦继续倡导提高认识,强调未检测到的可待因毒性可能是婴儿死亡的潜在原因。

## 婴儿死亡案件中的潜在不当行为 《纽约客》杂志的一篇文章调查了研究员莫谢·科伦是否在12天大的婴儿拉尼因疑似阿片类药物中毒死亡的案件中掩盖了关键发现。科伦实验室的初步报告显示,婴儿的胃中检测到高水平的吗啡,似乎排除了泰诺-3作为毒源的可能性。然而,随后的分析显示,检测到的并非吗啡,而是可待因,这引发了对科伦声称的质疑,并暗示婴儿可能通过母乳被给予了碾碎的泰诺-3。 讨论的中心是科伦是否篡改了实验室结果,以及母亲的母乳中检测到的高水平吗啡是否可能致命。一些评论员认为父母受到了不公平的审查,而另一些人则认为证据指向了故意给药。 这篇文章强调了对科伦处理此案的担忧,以及野心可能损害科学诚信的潜在可能。它还涉及了更广泛的科学自我纠正问题,以及在不太可能出现定罪的几十年旧案件中确定责任的挑战。许多评论员强调了怀疑精神和严格审查科学主张的重要性。
相关文章

原文

Opioids kill by suppressing the drive to breathe. They bind to receptors in the brain stem, altering the neurons that maintain patterns of respiration. Carbon dioxide builds up in the bloodstream, hypoxia sets in, and circulation falters. Brain damage follows, then death.

The coroner’s office asked one of Canada’s leading pediatricians and toxicologists, Gideon (Gidi) Koren, to examine Tariq’s file. For the past two decades, Koren had been running a program at the Hospital for Sick Children called Motherisk, which provided guidance for pregnant women and new mothers about drugs and breast-feeding. He was widely considered to be among the most capable research scientists in the field. Koren met with Rani’s physician and quickly ruled out foul play. “There was no evidence of psychiatric issues,” he later wrote. Instead, Koren interpreted the toxicology report as a scientific revelation: if mothers with a certain genetic predisposition took even a mild dose of codeine, the amount of morphine that ended up in their breast milk could kill their children.

A dose of codeine brings relief from pain only when the liver metabolizes a fraction of it into morphine. But the exact proportion that is converted into morphine can vary. Most people have two copies of the gene that carries out the conversion. Koren invited Rani to be tested, and discovered that she had three.

The concentration of morphine in Tariq’s blood was measured at seventy nanograms per millilitre. “If you have levels above twenty, you stop breathing,” Koren later said. Six months after Tariq’s death, Koren obtained a sample of Rani’s breast milk, which she had kept in her freezer. His lab measured its morphine concentration at eighty-seven nanograms per millilitre. Koren was stunned. “The level was several fold higher than ever described in the literature,” he noted. “This was the first time in history that a baby was reported dying from breast milk.”

Koren had long studied the transmission of opioids into breast milk. But he had never identified a mortal risk. Now, along with a few colleagues—including the deputy chief coroner of Ontario, James Cairns—he published his findings in The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals. Some women, like Rani, have a genetic predisposition to convert codeine into morphine faster and in higher quantities than the rest of the general population. Therefore, the authors concluded, “codeine cannot be considered as a safe drug for all infants during breastfeeding.”

The implications were terrifying. Millions of women—up to forty per cent of breast-feeding mothers in North America, according to Koren and his colleagues—might be prescribed codeine for postpartum pain, and yet almost none were being tested to see if they, like Rani, had more than the usual number of codeine-metabolizing genes. The risk was unevenly distributed across the population, according to ethnic background. Mothers from Finland have a one in a hundred chance of being so-called ultra-rapid metabolizers, according to Koren’s paper. But in Ethiopia the odds can rise to almost one in three.

Two birds look through window at woman sleeping in bed.

“What an amazing nest.”

Cartoon by Amy Hwang

Few academic-journal articles have had so abrupt an effect on the daily practice of medicine. Prior to its publication, the American Academy of Pediatrics had listed codeine as generally compatible with breast-feeding. “After we published it in Lancet, the F.D.A.—the Food and Drug Administration—said, ‘This is enough for us to change labelling,’ ” Koren said. Canadian and European health regulators soon followed suit. Doctors started prescribing other opioids for postpartum pain, such as hydromorphone and oxycodone, whose metabolic pathways are more predictable and less subject to genetic variations.

The Jamiesons’ identities were not revealed in Koren’s article. But they went public on April 30, 2007—exactly two years after Tariq’s death—filing a class-action lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and a subsidiary, the manufacturer of Tylenol-3, on behalf of “all persons in Canada” who had ingested the products of the drug through breast milk. “This terrible tragedy should never have occurred, and I am determined to see that this does not happen to other children,” Rani said. “What can they give me? Can they give me my son back? I want other people not to have their children die or be damaged.”

The Jamiesons went on to have three more children—all boys, who grew up in the shadow of the brother they never met. “You’re consumed with a certain sadness that’s always there,” Rani told a reporter, seven years after Tariq’s death. Two decades later, she still finds April the most difficult month: “It’s always there.”

Koren continued to sound the alarm about codeine for years. “He was always on a plane somewhere, and always had a million spinning plates—meetings, talks, conferences,” David Juurlink, a Canadian clinical toxicologist and a colleague of Koren’s at the Hospital for Sick Children, told me. Koren published more papers about the Jamieson case, and his Motherisk program provided data for studies of patients who had been prescribed codeine for postpartum pain. His ability to distill complex scientific processes into clear public-health messaging made him a regular commentator in the press. “It’s quite common not to know why a baby dies,” Koren said, in an interview for Canadian television. “I am quite sure that quite a few of those were codeine in breast milk. But no one checked. You don’t check, you do not find.”

Juurlink first met Koren in the late nineties, when he was a resident in clinical pharmacology. Koren, who had been practicing medicine in Canada since 1982, was leading rounds. “When you were with Gidi, you really felt like you were in the presence of someone who wasn’t just an expert—in the truest sense of the word—but was also a kind, good-natured, thoughtful, and intellectually agile man,” Juurlink recalled. “He was very avuncular. It was really one of the highlights of my training, learning from him.” Koren was revered by colleagues, and he had almost six hundred publications in scientific journals.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com