英国为书签网站支付了410万英镑。
UK Government’s ‘AI Skills Hub’ was delivered by PwC for £4.1M

原始链接: https://mahadk.com/posts/ai-skills-hub

英国政府新推出的“人工智能技能中心”,旨在到2030年提升1000万工人的技能,但尽管由普华永道耗资410万英镑(约合566万美元)开发,却面临强烈批评。该网站普遍被认为设计糟糕、存在漏洞,且缺乏原创内容——主要功能是链接到Salesforce的Trailhead等现有外部资源目录。 除了可用性问题和可访问性故障外,该中心还包含事实错误,引用了美国的“合理使用”法,而不是英国的“公平交易”指南。批评人士对浪费的公共资金感到愤怒,尤其是在医疗保健和教育等基本服务目前面临压力的情况下。人们还对将合同授予大型跨国公司而不是支持能够以更低的成本交付更优质产品的较小的英国本土网站开发公司这一决定表示担忧。该项目被视为政府支出令人失望的例子,以及培养本地人才的错失良机。

最近英国政府的一项采购引发批评:据报道,他们为简单的书签网站 mahadk.com 支付了 410 万英镑。该消息在 Hacker News 上分享,引发了关于政府支出和潜在管理不善的争论。 评论员质疑其价值,一些人认为如果它有助于技能提升计划,那么这笔费用是合理的。然而,许多人表示愤怒,并指出过去失败的案例,例如英国“追踪与追踪”系统花费了 293 亿英镑。 人们对采购流程表示担忧,猜测可能存在操纵的招标书(RFP),偏袒特定供应商,以及在“数字身份”系统等更大、更雄心勃勃的项目上浪费支出的可能性。一些人开玩笑说,该网站可以使用人工智能以较低的成本构建。这起事件加剧了人们对政府有效管理公共资金能力的怀疑。
相关文章

原文

The UK Government recently unveiled its ‘AI Skills Hub’, which wants to provide 10 million workers with AI skills by 2030. The main site was delivered by PwC for the low, low price of.. £4.1 million (~$5,657,000).

Image of the procurement contract

It is not good. Like, at all - the UI is insanely bad and it’s clear that this was just a vibecoded site (to be fair, this is the AI Skills Hub, but c’mon, where is the pride in your work? I would be ashamed to even release this as a prototype!)

Image of the AI Skills Hub

PwC didn’t even write any of the course content! The only thing the Skills Hub does is link out to external pages, like Salesforce’s free Trailhead learning platform:

Screenshot of Salesforce's Trailhead learning platform

Note that I’m fairly certain this course already existed before the contract was even awarded, so all the site does is.. link out to other sites?

PwC itself also admits that the site does not properly meet accessibility standards:

Accessibility policy

Even for those without a disability, the lack of here in this regard means that the site can be very confusing and buggy as a result.

Incorrect laws

The site has a course on “AI and intellectual property”. One thing it mentions is fair use:

Fair use

(credits for the photo)

Except that fair use is not a thing in the UK - that’s a US concept! The UK uses what’s known as “fair dealing”, which is more restrictive than fair use, so the details here are plain wrong.

Lack of care, lack of craft

The interface for this website has also not been clearly thought out - one glaring example is the process of actually enrolling in a course.

On the course page, the “Enroll Now” button is tiny, and if you don’t see it and try scrolling down to the bottom, you will find yourself nothing but a comment section!

Image of the course page

Then you have other bugs too, like the “Skills & Training Gap Analysis” - which is linked at the top of the site! - apparently being closed off to the public for no reason:

Image of the S&T Gap Analysis page


To be honest, seeing this made me angry.

I’m angry at the sheer wastefulness of the UK Government here. Our public services are collapsing - while £4 million is admittedly chump change for the UK government, there are real people behind these numbers - families waiting months for NHS appointments, children in crumbling schools, vulnerable people not getting the care they need. The waste feels particularly galling when you realise that almost no one will actually use this site!

I’m also angry that the small webdev businesses we have here in the UK were left out of this - for less than 5% of the cost, we’d have a better website and help out small businesses who actually care about their work, instead of handing the project to a multinational company that made nearly $60 billion in revenue in a year and has zero qualms about ripping off the British taxpayer.

Do better.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com