美国、英国、欧盟、澳大利亚等国将举行会议,讨论关键矿产联盟。
US, UK, EU, Australia and more to meet to discuss critical minerals alliance

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/feb/01/us-uk-eu-australia-critical-minerals-rare-earths-g7-minimum-price

本周在华盛顿举行的峰会汇集了美国、欧盟、英国、日本、澳大利亚和新西兰的部长,旨在建立一个战略联盟,重点是确保关键矿产供应链并减少对中国的依赖。 受到中国可能将出口武器化的担忧驱动——以去年的稀土限制为例——各国正积极寻求“去风险化”其经济。 澳大利亚正在建立一个价值6.1亿美元的战略矿产储备,效仿日本增强韧性的做法。 会议讨论包括美国对最低矿产价格的担保,但最近的报告表明这种情况不太可能发生。 美国旨在通过多元化的供应链来加强其经济、国家安全和能源未来。 除了矿产安全外,欧盟还将敦促美国撤销最近实施的全球钢铁衍生品关税,认为这违反了之前的协议并损害了信任。 此次峰会代表着更广泛的努力,旨在修复跨大西洋关系,超越以往贸易冲突的不确定性,专注于协作解决方案,以确保现代制造业的必需资源。

## 关键矿物联盟讨论 - 摘要 Hacker News 上进行了一场关于美国、英国、欧盟、澳大利亚等国计划建立联盟以确保关键矿物供应链的讨论,目前该供应链由中国主导。一个主要的争论点是,鉴于过去未能与中国较低的生产成本竞争,为这些矿物提供*最低*价格保证是否比设定最高价格和供应配额更有效。 参与者强调对美国的不信任,原因是其贸易政策和关税具有不可预测性。 许多评论员强调需要补贴才能使西方开采在经济上可行,并就最佳方法进行了辩论。 一个重要的主题是对中国2025年对稀土元素实施的出口管制的回应,这促使印度、日本和欧盟国家加速建立独立的供应链,利用现有的技术合作关系。 一些人认为,中国的行动是对其自身受到的贸易限制的可以预见的反应。 最终,对话表明人们担心西方处理原材料的能力,潜在的武器储备可能不足,以及鉴于潜在的政治变化,美国承诺的可靠性。 有一种观点认为,与中国进行合作,而不是仅仅关注替代方案,将是一种更理性的方法。
相关文章

原文

Ministers from the US, EU, UK, Japan, Australia and New Zealand will meet in Washington this week to discuss a strategic alliance over critical minerals.

The summit is being seen as a step to repair transatlantic ties fractured by a year of conflict with Donald Trump and pave the way for other alliances to help countries de-risk from China, including one centred on steel.

Australia said on Friday it would establish a A$1.2bn (£610m) strategic reserve of minerals it believes are vulnerable to supply disruption from China, which last April restricted exports on rare earths in response to Trump’s “liberation day” tariffs.

It is the second summit on the matter within a month and involves about 20 countries including the G7 members – the UK, US, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Canada – along with India and South Korea and Mexico, Australia, New Zealand and possibly Argentina.

One area of discussion will be calls for the US to guarantee a minimum price for critical minerals and rare earths. A report this week that Washington has decided against the idea sent shares downwards in Australia, which has been positioning itself as a critical minerals alternative to China with a decision to stockpile elements such as antimony and gallium.

It follows in the footsteps of Japan, which has actively built reserves for years to build resilience against China’s willingness to switch off supplies to advance its foreign policy.

Canberra’s resources minister, Madeleine King, said a US decision not to offer minimum pricing “won’t stop Australia from pursuing our critical minerals reserve programme”.

The Washington meeting has been convened by the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, as he and other countries in attendance hope to ramp up non-China supply chains as fast as possible with potential pricing and investment support.

“Strengthening critical mineral supply chains with international partners is vital for the US economy, national security, technological leadership, and a resilient energy future,” the US state department said in a pre-summit statement.

EU sources said that if talks were successful, a joint statement would follow which could be seen as a milestone shift in relations with allies working with the US to de-risk from China instead of constantly fighting off Trump’s tariff threats.

A UK minister will attend, the Foreign Office said, adding: “UK economic security goes hand in hand with national security. That’s why we are working to ensure a diversified critical minerals supply chain – a vital step to securing economic growth in the UK.

“We look forward to continuing these important discussions with key partners.”

The EU is also expected to use the summit to press the US to drop its new global steel derivative tariffs, which would lead to punitive levies on steel content on products that have elements of steel ranging from aluminum doors and bicycles to hair straighteners and offshore wind turbines.

The first derivative tariff list was published in August, after Trump shook hands on the EU tariff deal at his Scottish golf course in July, but before the joint statement on the deal at the end of August.

The Trump administration has threatened to introduce a second list of up to 700 products this January, but the list has yet to appear giving the EU and the UK hope that they could still drive home their point.

“We have complained a lot,” added one EU insider, while another said: “We hope they will take this into account as they are a breach of the deal in August.

“They could argue that the first batch were announced between the deal in Scotland and the US-EU joint statement, but the second batch are a breach of a deal.”

“This is about trust. You sign a deal and you trust it will apply,” said an EU source. “This constant threat of more tariffs, whether 10% because of Greenland or 200% on champagne because they don’t sign up to the ‘board of peace’ has to stop.”

The Trump administration has been convening multilateral consultations since October, when it agreed to a 12-month trade truce with China, which had threatened to choke off rare earth supplies in the escalating tariff dispute between them.

The minerals have become some of the most essential raw materials for modern manufacturing, needed to produce everything from smartphones to fighter jets, to wind turbines to music speakers.

Europe’s supply of permanent magnets, which are made with rare earths which have high magnetic properties, comes almost entirely from China.

According to senior European Commission officials in December, the EU uses 20,000 tonnes of permanent magnets a year, of which 17,000 to 18,000 tonnes come from China, with just 1,000 from the EU.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com