大卫·萨克斯揭露《纽约时报》掩盖雷德·霍夫曼在埃普斯坦档案中的信息。
David Sacks Exposes New York Times For Shielding Reid Hoffman In Epstein Files

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/david-sacks-exposes-new-york-times-shielding-reid-hoffman-epstein-files

风险投资家大卫·萨克斯强烈批评《纽约时报》,称其在报道杰弗里·埃普斯坦的同伙时存在双重标准。萨克斯认为,该报积极针对埃隆·马斯克和彼得·蒂尔等保守派科技人士,却对领英联合创始人里德·霍夫曼等左倾捐助者网开一面,后者在最近公开的埃普斯坦文件中被提及超过2600次。 根据文件显示,霍夫曼与埃普斯坦保持了多年的关系,曾多次拜访他的岛屿、联排别墅和牧场,并在埃普斯坦2008年认罪协议达成后继续保持联系。萨克斯指出,霍夫曼、马克·扎克伯格和埃普斯坦的一次晚餐是关键联系,但《纽约时报》对此 largely 忽略了。 萨克斯认为,这种选择性报道表明机构内部存在系统性的“腐烂”,这种腐烂是由党派忠诚和不愿审查强大的民主党捐助者所驱动的,最终侵蚀了公众信任。霍夫曼否认有任何不当行为。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Venture capitalist David Sacks has slammed The New York Times for its glaring failure to scrutinize Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn co-founder emerging as the top Silicon Valley figure in the explosive Jeffrey Epstein files.

In a scathing segment on the All-In Podcast, Sacks highlighted how the establishment media targets right-leaning tech moguls while giving a free pass to left-wing donors deeply entangled with Epstein.

“Brad, you speak about the corruption of power centers. I think a major one has to be The New York Times,” Sacks urged.

“The number-one person in the Epstein files from Silicon Valley which is Reid Hoffman mentioned 2,600 times had a multiyear relationship with Epstein and they call each other very good friends. They did deals together,” Sacks explained.

He continued, “Reid stayed at the trifecta which is not just the island but the townhouse and the New Mexico ranch. And if you’re gonna write about Mark Zuckerberg organize that famous dinner how can you not mention that as the root of Epstein’s involvement in Silicon Valley?”

“And yet Reid just gets a mentioned in one sentence of article along with several other people,” Sacks stressed.

He accused the Times of selective outrage, noting “It is crazy. I mean The New York Times clearly has a list people they consider approved targets. They are all right coded people like Elon or Peter Thiel.”

“And they become targets but the people who have donated hundreds millions dollars to the Democrat Party and have paid for dirty tricks against Trump, they basically are spared. Honestly this is just emblematic of the whole institutional rot in a distrust in the country right there,” Sacks explained.

“Part of the cabal, it’s part of the institutions that people are losing faith in, and you know Epstein was a scumbag and the fact of matter is we’re not seeing equal play on both sides,” Sacks further urged.

The remarks come amid fresh revelations from the Justice Department’s massive Epstein document dump, which includes emails showing Hoffman’s ongoing interactions with the convicted sex offender long after his 2008 plea deal.

Newly unsealed emails reveal Hoffman discussing visits to Epstein’s notorious private island, his New Mexico ranch, and his New York apartment. One 2015 message has Epstein boasting about a “wild dinner” with Hoffman, Mark Zuckerberg, and others.

The Free Beacon detailed how Hoffman maintained the relationship years after claiming it ended, including Skype calls, sushi meetings, and phone dates—all while Epstein name-dropped tech elites to lure investments.

Hoffman denies any wrongdoing.

This selective media coverage underscores a broader pattern where globalist insiders and Democrat funders evade accountability, while critics of the establishment face relentless attacks.

The following thread (click through) details the extent of the relationship between Epstein and Hoffman.

As the Epstein saga unravels, it exposes how power protects its own, fueling public distrust in institutions that prioritize partisan loyalty over truth.

Our earlier report detailed House Oversight Chairman James Comer’s push to question Bill Gates on his Epstein ties, amid bipartisan demands for answers. This aligns with Sacks’ critique of uneven scrutiny on elite figures.

We also covered Hillary Clinton’s attempt to turn her deposition into a public spectacle, dodging private grilling.

A further chilling email we covered hinted at depopulation discussions between Epstein and Gates, interpreted by some as elite scheming.

And then there are the tunnels. What was going on with the tunnels?

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com