(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43509679

Hacker News 的一个帖子讨论了 FDIC 最近的声明,该声明允许银行在适当管理风险的情况下参与加密货币活动。评论者表达了担忧,指出过去银行倒闭与加密货币敞口有关。一位用户询问如何追踪银行的加密货币参与以避免潜在损失,而另一位用户则讽刺地表示透明度不太可能实现。人们对风险管理的执行持怀疑态度,一位用户哀叹美国金融诈骗日益猖獗。该帖子还通过指向金融服务委员会关于此主题的听证会的链接提供了背景信息。


原文
Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
FDIC says banks can engage in crypto activities without prior approval (reuters.com)
18 points by speckx 1 hour ago | hide | past | favorite | 7 comments










Empirically, banks which get involved with crypto tend to blow up: https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/debanking-and-debunki...

How should one keep track of whether one's banks have non-negligible crypto exposure, so that one may move one's money to safer institutions well in advance of the inevitable disaster?



Empirically, a lot of early ventures into any area tend to blow up.

The first people to try are, almost by definition, the risk takers.

That is not to say they all blow up, or even that the ones that blow up do so because of this particular venture. Just high risk taking is correlated with both blowing up and trying the new thing first.

They may blow up from some completely unrelated risky venture.



You can't, that kind of transparency would be job-killing strangulation of business, and probably also DEI or something. So you have to just guess, and accept that you're fucked if you guess wrong. Enjoy!


> so long as they manage their risks appropriately.

How is this part enforced? Self review?



It's crazy how America is just devolving into an interlocking set of ever more obvious financial scams.


For the context, here is the Financial Services Committee hearing on the topic, and what led to these events

https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx...



What could possibly go wrong






Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



Search:
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com